From Prosecution to Co-optation and Capture: Electoral Uncertainty and Reversals of Anti-Corruption Efforts in Serbia

This article examines why incumbents in electoral democracies reverse initial efforts to prosecute political corruption committed under previous governments. Using a process-tracing comparison of Serbia before and after the 2014 elections, it argues that varying levels of electoral uncertainty shape incumbent incentives. High electoral uncertainty incentivises prosecutions to broaden electoral support, while consolidation of power shifts priorities towards co-opting business and political elites and judicial capture. Co-optation secures resources to finance the incumbent’s political machine and weakens the opposition, while judicial capture addresses the strategic fear of insulated courts and prosecutors potentially threatening the incumbent’s own corrupt network.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Europe Asia Studies
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2026.2726545
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

From Prosecution to Co-optation and Capture: Electoral Uncertainty and Reversals of Anti-Corruption Efforts in Serbia

Miloš Resimić
Europe Asia Studies
Corruption and Economic Development
article

From Prosecution to Co-optation and Capture: Electoral Uncertainty and Reversals of Anti-Corruption Efforts in Serbia

Miloš Resimić
article en

Abstract

This article examines why incumbents in electoral democracies reverse initial efforts to prosecute political corruption committed under previous governments. Using a process-tracing comparison of Serbia before and after the 2014 elections, it argues that varying levels of electoral uncertainty shape incumbent incentives. High electoral uncertainty incentivises prosecutions to broaden electoral support, while consolidation of power shifts priorities towards co-opting business and political elites and judicial capture. Co-optation secures resources to finance the incumbent’s political machine and weakens the opposition, while judicial capture addresses the strategic fear of insulated courts and prosecutors potentially threatening the incumbent’s own corrupt network.

Europe Asia Studies
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.