Validation of a Natural Language Processing-Assisted Chart Review Method for Identifying Advance Care Planning Documentation in Pediatric Critical Illness

OBJECTIVES: Reliable measurement of advance care planning (ACP) is essential for evaluating both communication practices and quality of care in pediatric critical illness. However, most ACP documentation is embedded in free-text clinical notes and cannot be captured using administrative data, while manual chart review is time-intensive and difficult to scale. We sought to validate a rule-based natural language processing (NLP) approach to identify ACP documentation in the electronic health record (EHR) compared with manual chart review. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center, quaternary PICU. PATIENTS: Children younger than 21 years admitted to the PICU for greater than 24 hours following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) from 2012 to 2024. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A rule-based NLP approach incorporating semi-automated chart review was developed through iterative refinement of previously validated keyword libraries to identify ACP documentation across prespecified domains in the EHR. In the validation cohort ( n = 95), NLP-assisted chart review showed complete agreement with manual chart review (F1 = 1.0) while substantially reducing abstraction time, enabling analysis of over 31,479 clinical notes in 3 days compared with 6 months for manual review of 43,179 notes. Among 125 children with OHCA, 65% had documented ACP discussions ( n = 81). Goals-of-care conversations were most common (99%), followed by limitations of life-sustaining treatment (78%), subspecialty palliative care involvement (28%), preferred location of death (9%), and hospice discussions (7%). CONCLUSIONS: NLP-assisted chart review can efficiently and accurately identify ACP documentation in pediatric critical illness for retrospective research and quality improvement efforts. This semi-automated workflow substantially reduced manual abstraction burden while maintaining excellent agreement with manual chart review, enabling effective abstraction of communication processes not captured in structured data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Explorations
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000001494
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Validation of a Natural Language Processing-Assisted Chart Review Method for Identifying Advance Care Planning Documentation in Pediatric Critical Illness

Suzanne R. Gouda, Charlotta Lindvall, Emily J. Upham, Danielle D. DeCourcey
Critical Care Explorations
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Validation of a Natural Language Processing-Assisted Chart Review Method for Identifying Advance Care Planning Documentation in Pediatric Critical Illness

Suzanne R. Gouda, Charlotta Lindvall, Emily J. Upham, Danielle D. DeCourcey
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reliable measurement of advance care planning (ACP) is essential for evaluating both communication practices and quality of care in pediatric critical illness. However, most ACP documentation is embedded in free-text clinical notes and cannot be captured using administrative data, while manual chart review is time-intensive and difficult to scale. We sought to validate a rule-based natural language processing (NLP) approach to identify ACP documentation in the electronic health record (EHR) compared with manual chart review. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center, quaternary PICU. PATIENTS: Children younger than 21 years admitted to the PICU for greater than 24 hours following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) from 2012 to 2024. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A rule-based NLP approach incorporating semi-automated chart review was developed through iterative refinement of previously validated keyword libraries to identify ACP documentation across prespecified domains in the EHR. In the validation cohort ( n = 95), NLP-assisted chart review showed complete agreement with manual chart review (F1 = 1.0) while substantially reducing abstraction time, enabling analysis of over 31,479 clinical notes in 3 days compared with 6 months for manual review of 43,179 notes. Among 125 children with OHCA, 65% had documented ACP discussions ( n = 81). Goals-of-care conversations were most common (99%), followed by limitations of life-sustaining treatment (78%), subspecialty palliative care involvement (28%), preferred location of death (9%), and hospice discussions (7%). CONCLUSIONS: NLP-assisted chart review can efficiently and accurately identify ACP documentation in pediatric critical illness for retrospective research and quality improvement efforts. This semi-automated workflow substantially reduced manual abstraction burden while maintaining excellent agreement with manual chart review, enabling effective abstraction of communication processes not captured in structured data.

Critical Care ExplorationsVol. 8(10)
Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.