Proper Functions as Selected Effect Functions of Fixed Traits

Abstract This article proposes restricting selected effect (SE) proper functions to effectively fixed traits—traits at or close to fixation in the population. SE functions, as historical fitness contributions in general, can only ground gradual normative standards at the character-state level, whereas proper functions are further expected to ground a stronger normativity at the character level. Proper function thus requires the trait’s fitness contributions to be sufficiently strong and sustained, and fixation provides a principled standard for such contributions. The restricted account better addresses the explanatory challenge to proper functions while preserving their theoretical goals of grounding robust teleology and normativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2026.10281
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Proper Functions as Selected Effect Functions of Fixed Traits

Tianqin Ren
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Proper Functions as Selected Effect Functions of Fixed Traits

Tianqin Ren
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article proposes restricting selected effect (SE) proper functions to effectively fixed traits—traits at or close to fixation in the population. SE functions, as historical fitness contributions in general, can only ground gradual normative standards at the character-state level, whereas proper functions are further expected to ground a stronger normativity at the character level. Proper function thus requires the trait’s fitness contributions to be sufficiently strong and sustained, and fixation provides a principled standard for such contributions. The restricted account better addresses the explanatory challenge to proper functions while preserving their theoretical goals of grounding robust teleology and normativity.

Philosophy of Science
University of Missouri (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.