Between Sex and Work: Regulating Webcamming Under the Platform Work Directive

Abstract This article examines the European Union Platform Work Directive (PWD) through the lens of webcamming, a form of platformised sex work largely excluded from regulatory debates on platform labour. Drawing on legal analysis and empirical research with webcam performers and industry experts, it assesses whether the PWD addresses the unique challenges of this feminised and stigmatised sector. Performers face opaque algorithmic management, restrictive content rules and limited autonomy. The PWD’s reclassification mechanism could offer new rights, but many performers resist formal employment due to stigma, surveillance and legal risks. Even without reclassification, the Directive introduces rights around transparency, data protection and automated decision-making. However, it fails to account for the specific challenges of erotic labour, including ownership of content, discrimination and digital violence. The article argues for inclusive, evidence-based policymaking that centres sex workers’ voices and addresses the structural barriers they face in accessing labour rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Feminist Legal Studies
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-026-09624-4
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Between Sex and Work: Regulating Webcamming Under the Platform Work Directive

Hanne Marleen Stegeman, Salomé Lannier, Rébecca Suzanne Franco, Hannah DeLacey
Feminist Legal Studies
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Between Sex and Work: Regulating Webcamming Under the Platform Work Directive

Hanne Marleen Stegeman, Salomé Lannier, Rébecca Suzanne Franco, Hannah DeLacey
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the European Union Platform Work Directive (PWD) through the lens of webcamming, a form of platformised sex work largely excluded from regulatory debates on platform labour. Drawing on legal analysis and empirical research with webcam performers and industry experts, it assesses whether the PWD addresses the unique challenges of this feminised and stigmatised sector. Performers face opaque algorithmic management, restrictive content rules and limited autonomy. The PWD’s reclassification mechanism could offer new rights, but many performers resist formal employment due to stigma, surveillance and legal risks. Even without reclassification, the Directive introduces rights around transparency, data protection and automated decision-making. However, it fails to account for the specific challenges of erotic labour, including ownership of content, discrimination and digital violence. The article argues for inclusive, evidence-based policymaking that centres sex workers’ voices and addresses the structural barriers they face in accessing labour rights.

Feminist Legal Studies
Leiden University (NL), University of Luxembourg (LU), Utrecht University (NL), University of Exeter (GB), University of the Arts Utrecht (NL), Luxembourg School of Business (LU), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.