Modeling psychological processes in tinnitus disorder: Comparison of quantitative methods

Tinnitus is a common experience, and a minority of people experience severe distress related to their tinnitus. Studies of the contribution of psychological factors are often small and replications are rare. Here we examined adults ( N = 125) with tinnitus distress who responded to an average of 96 surveys regarding tinnitus distress, anxiety and worry, and cognitive symptoms. We replicated previous findings using dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM). In addition, we examined an alternative method, the group iterative multiple model estimation (GIMME) procedure. Findings across methods suggested that most relationships between tinnitus distress and the psychological factors assessed in this study occurred contemporaneously or across a shorter time lag than that used here. Whereas DSEM found significant prospective cross-construct effects overall, GIMME suggested such paths were limited to individuals rather than groups or subgroups. Future work should examine how such modeling can inform prediction of outcomes (e.g., treatment effects).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methodological Innovations
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991261488303
Primary Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Modeling psychological processes in tinnitus disorder: Comparison of quantitative methods

Kathleen M. Gates, Chaewon Lee, Thomas L. Rodebaugh, Dorina Kallogjeri et al.
Methodological Innovations
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
article

Modeling psychological processes in tinnitus disorder: Comparison of quantitative methods

Kathleen M. Gates, Chaewon Lee, Thomas L. Rodebaugh, Dorina Kallogjeri, Jin Shin, Madelyn R. Frumkin, Karmela Dizdar, Jay Piccirillo
article en

Abstract

Tinnitus is a common experience, and a minority of people experience severe distress related to their tinnitus. Studies of the contribution of psychological factors are often small and replications are rare. Here we examined adults ( N = 125) with tinnitus distress who responded to an average of 96 surveys regarding tinnitus distress, anxiety and worry, and cognitive symptoms. We replicated previous findings using dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM). In addition, we examined an alternative method, the group iterative multiple model estimation (GIMME) procedure. Findings across methods suggested that most relationships between tinnitus distress and the psychological factors assessed in this study occurred contemporaneously or across a shorter time lag than that used here. Whereas DSEM found significant prospective cross-construct effects overall, GIMME suggested such paths were limited to individuals rather than groups or subgroups. Future work should examine how such modeling can inform prediction of outcomes (e.g., treatment effects).

Methodological Innovations
Dartmouth College (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modeling psychological processes in tinnitus disorder: Comparison of quantitative methods — Kathleen M. Gates, Chaewon Lee, et al. · Methodological Innovations (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS