Can Prediction Markets Price Reality? Insights into the Political Economy of Post-Truth

This article analyzes contemporary prediction markets as financialized infrastructures that convert uncertain future events into tradable claims under conditions of post-truth and overaccumulation. It argues that platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket do not invent speculation on uncertainty, but reorganize older forms of event wagering through exchange-like platforms, continuous price formation, and formal procedures of verification and settlement. Bringing Marxist political economy into conversation with critiques of postmodern epistemic instability, the article shows how financialization expands accumulation into increasingly abstract domains where expectations, interpretations, and public recognition become objects of exchange. Prediction markets price not simply future outcomes, but the institutional processes through which those outcomes are classified, verified, and settled. The article further argues that artificial intelligence intensifies this recursive logic by scaling automated judgments about others’ expectations. Prediction markets thereby appear as financialized mutations of betting and as mechanisms through which post-truth conditions enter circuits of capitalist accumulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Critical Thought
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2026.2733694
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Can Prediction Markets Price Reality? Insights into the Political Economy of Post-Truth

Elliot Goodell Ugalde
International Critical Thought
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Can Prediction Markets Price Reality? Insights into the Political Economy of Post-Truth

Elliot Goodell Ugalde
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes contemporary prediction markets as financialized infrastructures that convert uncertain future events into tradable claims under conditions of post-truth and overaccumulation. It argues that platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket do not invent speculation on uncertainty, but reorganize older forms of event wagering through exchange-like platforms, continuous price formation, and formal procedures of verification and settlement. Bringing Marxist political economy into conversation with critiques of postmodern epistemic instability, the article shows how financialization expands accumulation into increasingly abstract domains where expectations, interpretations, and public recognition become objects of exchange. Prediction markets price not simply future outcomes, but the institutional processes through which those outcomes are classified, verified, and settled. The article further argues that artificial intelligence intensifies this recursive logic by scaling automated judgments about others’ expectations. Prediction markets thereby appear as financialized mutations of betting and as mechanisms through which post-truth conditions enter circuits of capitalist accumulation.

International Critical Thought
Queen's University (CA)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can Prediction Markets Price Reality? Insights into the Political Economy of Post-Truth — Elliot Goodell Ugalde · International Critical Thought (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS