Navigating the digital shift: Stakeholders’ power and social sustainability in Agri-food supply chains

Social sustainability remains a critical yet underexplored challenge in agri-food supply chains. Although supply chain digitalization (SCD) is widely acknowledged to enhance transparency, coordination and accountability, existing research has paid limited attention to its social sustainability implications and the mechanisms through which such outcomes are realized. In particular, how stakeholder power dynamics condition the translation of digitalization into social sustainability remains insufficiently theorized. Drawing on resource dependence theory and the power dependence perspective, this study developed and tested a moderated mediation model that explains how SCD is associated with social sustainability through performance-mediated mechanisms under heterogeneous governance conditions. Using survey data from 328 agri-food firms in China’s national digital transformation pilot cities, we examined financial and market performances as distinct mediating pathways while differentiating stakeholder power into non-, reward- and coercive-mediated forms. Our results indicate that SCD contributes to social sustainability primarily through market performance, while financial performance plays a partial mediating role. Moreover, stakeholder power exerts asymmetric moderating effects across these pathways. This study advances theory by conceptualizing social sustainability as a contingent outcome of digitalization-enabled resource dependence and by positioning stakeholder power as a governance condition shaping socially sustainable planning and control outcomes in agri-food supply chains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Production Planning & Control
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2026.2730718
Primary Topic
Food Supply Chain Traceability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Navigating the digital shift: Stakeholders’ power and social sustainability in Agri-food supply chains

Ying Yang, Xiongyong Zhou, Haiyan Lu
Production Planning & Control
Food Supply Chain Traceability
article

Navigating the digital shift: Stakeholders’ power and social sustainability in Agri-food supply chains

Ying Yang, Xiongyong Zhou, Haiyan Lu
article en

Abstract

Social sustainability remains a critical yet underexplored challenge in agri-food supply chains. Although supply chain digitalization (SCD) is widely acknowledged to enhance transparency, coordination and accountability, existing research has paid limited attention to its social sustainability implications and the mechanisms through which such outcomes are realized. In particular, how stakeholder power dynamics condition the translation of digitalization into social sustainability remains insufficiently theorized. Drawing on resource dependence theory and the power dependence perspective, this study developed and tested a moderated mediation model that explains how SCD is associated with social sustainability through performance-mediated mechanisms under heterogeneous governance conditions. Using survey data from 328 agri-food firms in China’s national digital transformation pilot cities, we examined financial and market performances as distinct mediating pathways while differentiating stakeholder power into non-, reward- and coercive-mediated forms. Our results indicate that SCD contributes to social sustainability primarily through market performance, while financial performance plays a partial mediating role. Moreover, stakeholder power exerts asymmetric moderating effects across these pathways. This study advances theory by conceptualizing social sustainability as a contingent outcome of digitalization-enabled resource dependence and by positioning stakeholder power as a governance condition shaping socially sustainable planning and control outcomes in agri-food supply chains.

Production Planning & Control
Fuzhou University (CN), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Food Supply Chain Traceability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.