Loneliness and all-cause mortality in the United States

Importance Loneliness affects more than half of US adults and has been declared a public health epidemic, yet whether clinically documented loneliness independently predicts mortality across diverse populations remains unclear. Objective To examine the association between clinically documented loneliness and all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years, overall and by sex, race and ethnicity, and age. Methods We conducted a propensity score–matched retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, comprising electronic health record data from 65 health care organizations. Adults aged 18–90 years with at least one clinical encounter between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, were eligible. Patients with a clinically documented diagnosis of loneliness were matched 1:1 (n = 28,944 per group) on age, sex, race and ethnicity, and 12 comorbidity domains to comparison patients with outpatient engagement and no loneliness diagnosis. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years. Between-group differences were assessed using risk differences, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models, overall and across prespecified subgroups. Results Among 57,888 matched adults (mean age, 55.4 years; 62.9% female), loneliness was associated with increased mortality at every horizon: 1-year hazard ratio (HR), 1.52 (95% CI, 1.40–1.66); 3-year HR, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.27–1.43); and 5-year HR, 1.29 (95% CI, 1.22–1.35). Absolute survival gaps widened from 1.57 to 2.82 percentage points. The largest 1-year relative excess occurred among male patients (HR, 1.85) and Hispanic patients (risk ratio, 2.33). Black patients had the greatest 3-year absolute gap (2.49 percentage points). Working-age adults showed sustained excess hazard across all windows (HR, 1.34–1.42), whereas older adults had the largest 1-year absolute gap (2.28 percentage points) with convergence by 5 years. Conclusion Clinically documented loneliness was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years, with the burden varying by sex, race and ethnicity, and age. These findings identify loneliness as a measurable, independent mortality risk marker and suggest that routine screening and targeted psychosocial intervention warrant prospective evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354773
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Loneliness and all-cause mortality in the United States

Miriam B Michael, Ayomide Ogunsakin, Temitayo Ogundipe, Oluwasegun Austine Akinyemi et al.
PLoS ONE
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Loneliness and all-cause mortality in the United States

Miriam B Michael, Ayomide Ogunsakin, Temitayo Ogundipe, Oluwasegun Austine Akinyemi, Oluebubechukwu Eze, Kaelyn Gordon, Delia Singleton, Samar Khalil, Ifeoma Mba-Madubuike, Temitope Ogundare, Mojisola Fasokun, Kakra Hughes
article en

Abstract

Importance Loneliness affects more than half of US adults and has been declared a public health epidemic, yet whether clinically documented loneliness independently predicts mortality across diverse populations remains unclear. Objective To examine the association between clinically documented loneliness and all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years, overall and by sex, race and ethnicity, and age. Methods We conducted a propensity score–matched retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, comprising electronic health record data from 65 health care organizations. Adults aged 18–90 years with at least one clinical encounter between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, were eligible. Patients with a clinically documented diagnosis of loneliness were matched 1:1 (n = 28,944 per group) on age, sex, race and ethnicity, and 12 comorbidity domains to comparison patients with outpatient engagement and no loneliness diagnosis. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years. Between-group differences were assessed using risk differences, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models, overall and across prespecified subgroups. Results Among 57,888 matched adults (mean age, 55.4 years; 62.9% female), loneliness was associated with increased mortality at every horizon: 1-year hazard ratio (HR), 1.52 (95% CI, 1.40–1.66); 3-year HR, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.27–1.43); and 5-year HR, 1.29 (95% CI, 1.22–1.35). Absolute survival gaps widened from 1.57 to 2.82 percentage points. The largest 1-year relative excess occurred among male patients (HR, 1.85) and Hispanic patients (risk ratio, 2.33). Black patients had the greatest 3-year absolute gap (2.49 percentage points). Working-age adults showed sustained excess hazard across all windows (HR, 1.34–1.42), whereas older adults had the largest 1-year absolute gap (2.28 percentage points) with convergence by 5 years. Conclusion Clinically documented loneliness was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years, with the burden varying by sex, race and ethnicity, and age. These findings identify loneliness as a measurable, independent mortality risk marker and suggest that routine screening and targeted psychosocial intervention warrant prospective evaluation.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Howard University (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Columbia University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.