Knowledge, Practice, and Socio‐Behavioral Determinants of Physical Activity Among Tunisian Medical Students: A Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Physical inactivity has become a critical public health issue worldwide, contributing to numerous chronic diseases. As future healthcare providers, medical students' understanding and practice of physical activity are essential both for their personal health and their professional capacity to guide patients. This study examined physical activity knowledge, engagement levels, and determining factors among medical students at a Tunisian university. Methods A cross‐sectional analysis was conducted among 155 medical students (mean age 24.5 ± 2.8 years, 58.7% female). Participants completed a 25‐item online questionnaire that collected sociodemographic data (age, gender, academic year, BMI) and assessed physical activity knowledge, behaviors, and barriers using the validated Ricci‐Gagnon scale. The questionnaire evaluated both personal physical activity practices and understanding of activity guidelines for health promotion. Results Among 155 participants (91 female, 64 male), 62.6% ( n = 97) correctly distinguished physical activity from sport. Most students (85.8%, n = 133) recognized that there is no age limit for participating in physical activity. While 86.5% ( n = 134) were aware of physical activity guidelines, only 3.2% knew methods to assess their activity levels. The Ricci‐Gagnon scale classified 68.4% ( n = 102) as physically active, though only 49% reported regular sports participation. The primary barriers included a lack of time (89.9%, n = 71) and motivation (22.8%, n = 18). Logistic regression identified independent predictors of higher activity levels: female gender (OR, 2.4), obesity status (OR, 2.6), being in the first or second cycle of medical study (OR, 2.6), and good physical activity knowledge (OR, 2.2). Conclusion These findings highlight essential gaps in medical students' physical activity knowledge despite adequate activity levels. The association between knowledge and activity suggests education could benefit both student health and clinical skills. Reported barriers, such as time constraints, call for structural changes in medical training. Curriculum reforms should prioritize prescribing, training, and assessing practical activities. Addressing these needs will better prepare future physicians to promote physical activity in patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Science Reports
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.73158
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Knowledge, Practice, and Socio‐Behavioral Determinants of Physical Activity Among Tunisian Medical Students: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Hatem Ghouili, Omar Hammouda, Raul Ioan Muntean, Halil İ̇brahim Ceylan et al.
Health Science Reports
Physical Activity and Health
article

Knowledge, Practice, and Socio‐Behavioral Determinants of Physical Activity Among Tunisian Medical Students: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Hatem Ghouili, Omar Hammouda, Raul Ioan Muntean, Halil İ̇brahim Ceylan, Samy Kammoun, Walid Feki, Rim Kammoun, Asma Haddar, Masmoudi Kaouthar, Aiman Jmal, Ismail Dergaa
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Physical inactivity has become a critical public health issue worldwide, contributing to numerous chronic diseases. As future healthcare providers, medical students' understanding and practice of physical activity are essential both for their personal health and their professional capacity to guide patients. This study examined physical activity knowledge, engagement levels, and determining factors among medical students at a Tunisian university. Methods A cross‐sectional analysis was conducted among 155 medical students (mean age 24.5 ± 2.8 years, 58.7% female). Participants completed a 25‐item online questionnaire that collected sociodemographic data (age, gender, academic year, BMI) and assessed physical activity knowledge, behaviors, and barriers using the validated Ricci‐Gagnon scale. The questionnaire evaluated both personal physical activity practices and understanding of activity guidelines for health promotion. Results Among 155 participants (91 female, 64 male), 62.6% ( n = 97) correctly distinguished physical activity from sport. Most students (85.8%, n = 133) recognized that there is no age limit for participating in physical activity. While 86.5% ( n = 134) were aware of physical activity guidelines, only 3.2% knew methods to assess their activity levels. The Ricci‐Gagnon scale classified 68.4% ( n = 102) as physically active, though only 49% reported regular sports participation. The primary barriers included a lack of time (89.9%, n = 71) and motivation (22.8%, n = 18). Logistic regression identified independent predictors of higher activity levels: female gender (OR, 2.4), obesity status (OR, 2.6), being in the first or second cycle of medical study (OR, 2.6), and good physical activity knowledge (OR, 2.2). Conclusion These findings highlight essential gaps in medical students' physical activity knowledge despite adequate activity levels. The association between knowledge and activity suggests education could benefit both student health and clinical skills. Reported barriers, such as time constraints, call for structural changes in medical training. Curriculum reforms should prioritize prescribing, training, and assessing practical activities. Addressing these needs will better prepare future physicians to promote physical activity in patient care.

Health Science ReportsVol. 9(10)
University of Sfax (TN), Université Paris Nanterre (FR), Hopital Universitaire Hedi Chaker (TN), 1 Decembrie 1918 University (RO), Hopital Universitaire Habib Bourguiba (TN), University of Jendouba (TN), Atatürk University (TR), Manouba University (TN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.