“Already outdated and still under review”: mapping the landscape of research on adolescent development and AI chatbot use

Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly embedded in adolescents’ daily lives, yet developmental science research struggles to keep pace with adoption. This mixed-methods study gathered developmental expert perspectives via a survey ( n = 141 researchers studying youth and technology and adjacent professionals) and semi-structured interviews ( n = 15) to inform a coordinated research and policy agenda on adolescent AI use. The study aims were to identify (1) priority AI use cases for future study, (2) priority research questions and methods, as well as barriers to future research, and (3) societal guardrails that developmental professionals recommend enacting now, while research is underway. Participants cautioned against vague “screen time” measures and agreed that nearly all use cases merit study but prioritized those with severe or irreversible immediate-term harms, AI literacy, AI as a social/relational actor, AI-generated (mis)information, and overreliance. Participants emphasized that methodological pluralism and triangulation, including within individual studies, are essential, agreeing that different methods can be complementary to address distinct research questions. Key barriers included the rapid pace of change in AI technology and use relative to academic timelines, limited industry transparency, funding gaps, and misaligned academic incentives. Proposed solutions included shared infrastructure, interdisciplinary consortia, and community partnerships. Participants underscored that responsibility for safe AI should not rest primarily on adolescents and families and identified three immediate guardrails: enforceable youth-centered regulation, developmentally informed design, and multidimensional AI literacy. Findings clarify a preliminary direction for the field and emphasize that coordination among researchers and between sectors is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-03380-4
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

“Already outdated and still under review”: mapping the landscape of research on adolescent development and AI chatbot use

Anthony Vaccaro, Anne Julia Maheux, Kaitlyn Burnell, Caitlin Mbuakoto et al.
AI & Society
Child Development and Digital Technology
article

“Already outdated and still under review”: mapping the landscape of research on adolescent development and AI chatbot use

Anthony Vaccaro, Anne Julia Maheux, Kaitlyn Burnell, Caitlin Mbuakoto, Jana Haritatos, Madeline G. Valentino
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly embedded in adolescents’ daily lives, yet developmental science research struggles to keep pace with adoption. This mixed-methods study gathered developmental expert perspectives via a survey ( n = 141 researchers studying youth and technology and adjacent professionals) and semi-structured interviews ( n = 15) to inform a coordinated research and policy agenda on adolescent AI use. The study aims were to identify (1) priority AI use cases for future study, (2) priority research questions and methods, as well as barriers to future research, and (3) societal guardrails that developmental professionals recommend enacting now, while research is underway. Participants cautioned against vague “screen time” measures and agreed that nearly all use cases merit study but prioritized those with severe or irreversible immediate-term harms, AI literacy, AI as a social/relational actor, AI-generated (mis)information, and overreliance. Participants emphasized that methodological pluralism and triangulation, including within individual studies, are essential, agreeing that different methods can be complementary to address distinct research questions. Key barriers included the rapid pace of change in AI technology and use relative to academic timelines, limited industry transparency, funding gaps, and misaligned academic incentives. Proposed solutions included shared infrastructure, interdisciplinary consortia, and community partnerships. Participants underscored that responsibility for safe AI should not rest primarily on adolescents and families and identified three immediate guardrails: enforceable youth-centered regulation, developmentally informed design, and multidimensional AI literacy. Findings clarify a preliminary direction for the field and emphasize that coordination among researchers and between sectors is needed.

AI & Society
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), HopeLab (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Child Development and Digital Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.