Preliminary Objections Judgment in Chirinos Salamanca v. Venez. & Related Documents: Venezuela’s Retroactive Un-Denunciation of the American Convention on Human Rights (Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. & Inter-Am. C.H.R.)

Abstract In Chirinos Salamanca v. Venezuela , the Inter-American Court of Human Rights held that the 2019 re-ratification of the American Convention on Human Rights by the opposition-controlled 2015 National Assembly of Venezuela retroactively nullified former president Nicolás Maduro’s denunciation of the Convention that had taken effect in 2013. The judgment builds upon the Court’s jurisprudence on the pro persona and democratic principles, opens the door for other cases claiming violations during a particularly repressive period under Maduro, and invites expanded scrutiny by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. It also raises complicated questions about government recognition and representation before international organizations and courts, the ability to give retroactive effect to treaty obligations, and the permissibility of human rights treaty denunciations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Legal Materials
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2026.10168
Primary Topic
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Preliminary Objections Judgment in Chirinos Salamanca v. Venez. & Related Documents: Venezuela’s Retroactive Un-Denunciation of the American Convention on Human Rights (Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. & Inter-Am. C.H.R.)

James L. Bischoff
International Legal Materials
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
article

Preliminary Objections Judgment in Chirinos Salamanca v. Venez. & Related Documents: Venezuela’s Retroactive Un-Denunciation of the American Convention on Human Rights (Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. & Inter-Am. C.H.R.)

James L. Bischoff
article en

Abstract

Abstract In Chirinos Salamanca v. Venezuela , the Inter-American Court of Human Rights held that the 2019 re-ratification of the American Convention on Human Rights by the opposition-controlled 2015 National Assembly of Venezuela retroactively nullified former president Nicolás Maduro’s denunciation of the Convention that had taken effect in 2013. The judgment builds upon the Court’s jurisprudence on the pro persona and democratic principles, opens the door for other cases claiming violations during a particularly repressive period under Maduro, and invites expanded scrutiny by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. It also raises complicated questions about government recognition and representation before international organizations and courts, the ability to give retroactive effect to treaty obligations, and the permissibility of human rights treaty denunciations.

International Legal Materials
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.