Transitioning from SAA to TPA: Governance and Communication Requirements

The total portfolio approach (TPA) offers significant benefits over traditional strategic asset allocation (SAA), and its appeal has grown alongside institutional asset owners’ increasing use of alternatives. Transitioning from SAA to TPA requires new thinking, new capabilities, and different delegation of authorities from board to management. This article lays out a phased transition from SAA to TPA, letting an organization choose its pace and how far it wishes to go. It also addresses the communications a board needs, and questions it might ask, to oversee management across five areas: (i) people and culture, (ii) risk management, (iii) asset allocation, (iv) delegation of authorities, and (v) measures of success. Progress through these steps can be sequential, with an initial focus on foundational capabilities that also benefit an existing SAA approach, ahead of necessary changes to governance or incentives. TPA implementation can thus evolve at a pace suited to each fund’s circumstances, letting the board build familiarity with the approach over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2026.071
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Transitioning from SAA to TPA: Governance and Communication Requirements

Donald M. Raymond, Stefano Cavaglia
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Community Development and Social Impact
article

Transitioning from SAA to TPA: Governance and Communication Requirements

Donald M. Raymond, Stefano Cavaglia
article en

Abstract

The total portfolio approach (TPA) offers significant benefits over traditional strategic asset allocation (SAA), and its appeal has grown alongside institutional asset owners’ increasing use of alternatives. Transitioning from SAA to TPA requires new thinking, new capabilities, and different delegation of authorities from board to management. This article lays out a phased transition from SAA to TPA, letting an organization choose its pace and how far it wishes to go. It also addresses the communications a board needs, and questions it might ask, to oversee management across five areas: (i) people and culture, (ii) risk management, (iii) asset allocation, (iv) delegation of authorities, and (v) measures of success. Progress through these steps can be sequential, with an initial focus on foundational capabilities that also benefit an existing SAA approach, ahead of necessary changes to governance or incentives. TPA implementation can thus evolve at a pace suited to each fund’s circumstances, letting the board build familiarity with the approach over time.

The Journal of Portfolio Management
Griffith University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Community Development and Social Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transitioning from SAA to TPA: Governance and Communication Requirements — Donald M. Raymond, Stefano Cavaglia · The Journal of Portfolio Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS