The role of self-study-report in negotiating local accreditation and international standards at a Qatar-based international branch campus

Purpose The expansion of international branch campuses (IBCs) across the Gulf Cooperation Council region has led to the development of national quality assurance frameworks through the establishment of accreditation agencies, such as the National Committee for Qualifications and Academic Accreditation in Qatar. The purpose of this study is to examine how an IBC navigates the alignment of internationally accredited quality standards with emerging domestic regulatory requirements. Design/methodology/approach Guided by actor-network theory and using a qualitative case study approach, this study traces the self-study report of an IBC in Qatar as a key accreditation artefact, mapping actors, relationships and activities within the accreditation network. Documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews serve as primary sources of evidence. Findings The findings indicate that national priorities, data-informed continuous improvement, contextualisation and the normalisation of evidence use shape local definitions of quality. Research limitations/implications As a single-site qualitative case study, the findings are context-specific. Nonetheless, the insights generated may be transferable to similar IBC contexts. The interview sample was limited to personnel directly involved in accreditation, and excluded faculty members without such involvement, as well as external stakeholders whose perspectives may differ from those represented in this study. Future research could include these groups, alongside students, regulators and parent-institution representatives. Practical implications From a policy perspective, the findings offer insights for policymakers seeking to refine Qatar’s emerging accreditation system while balancing international standards with national priorities. Originality/value This study contributes to higher education quality assurance by drawing on actor-network theory to show how documentary artefacts participate in processes of translation and by offering practical insights into the development of Qatar’s emerging accreditation system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality Assurance in Education
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-06-2026-0275
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The role of self-study-report in negotiating local accreditation and international standards at a Qatar-based international branch campus

Anwar Nawaf Al-Thani
Quality Assurance in Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

The role of self-study-report in negotiating local accreditation and international standards at a Qatar-based international branch campus

Anwar Nawaf Al-Thani
article en

Abstract

Purpose The expansion of international branch campuses (IBCs) across the Gulf Cooperation Council region has led to the development of national quality assurance frameworks through the establishment of accreditation agencies, such as the National Committee for Qualifications and Academic Accreditation in Qatar. The purpose of this study is to examine how an IBC navigates the alignment of internationally accredited quality standards with emerging domestic regulatory requirements. Design/methodology/approach Guided by actor-network theory and using a qualitative case study approach, this study traces the self-study report of an IBC in Qatar as a key accreditation artefact, mapping actors, relationships and activities within the accreditation network. Documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews serve as primary sources of evidence. Findings The findings indicate that national priorities, data-informed continuous improvement, contextualisation and the normalisation of evidence use shape local definitions of quality. Research limitations/implications As a single-site qualitative case study, the findings are context-specific. Nonetheless, the insights generated may be transferable to similar IBC contexts. The interview sample was limited to personnel directly involved in accreditation, and excluded faculty members without such involvement, as well as external stakeholders whose perspectives may differ from those represented in this study. Future research could include these groups, alongside students, regulators and parent-institution representatives. Practical implications From a policy perspective, the findings offer insights for policymakers seeking to refine Qatar’s emerging accreditation system while balancing international standards with national priorities. Originality/value This study contributes to higher education quality assurance by drawing on actor-network theory to show how documentary artefacts participate in processes of translation and by offering practical insights into the development of Qatar’s emerging accreditation system.

Quality Assurance in Education
Lancaster University (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.