Grief and Grievance: Lessons from Star Wars for US Foreign Policy

Abstract This essay examines Star Wars canon as a compelling representation of politicized grief and uses it to complicate how US-based political analysts and media, and specifically the US foreign policy establishment, connects emotion and grievance to contentious and violent politics. It outlines how various characters embody, persevere, deflect, and work through grief of different sources, magnitudes, and expressions. At the same time, the essay considers the political meaning of death and mortality by using different characters’ experiences to consider how grief operates across different political registers and how it collapses distinctions between personal and political. The essay then explores how the franchise’s explorations of grief mirror, challenge, or reveal blank spots in US conceptions of loss, resentment, and mourning in war and how they reverberate politically. It argues that policy analysts’ reduction of people to their anger and resentment is an attempt to flatten and individualize their political behavior and motivations, rather than understanding these emotions as aspects of people’s multi-layered, communal and structural experiences of injustice and injury that feed into collective action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Forum
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2026-0024
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Grief and Grievance: Lessons from Star Wars for US Foreign Policy

Sarah Parkinson
The Forum
Interdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies
article

Grief and Grievance: Lessons from Star Wars for US Foreign Policy

Sarah Parkinson
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay examines Star Wars canon as a compelling representation of politicized grief and uses it to complicate how US-based political analysts and media, and specifically the US foreign policy establishment, connects emotion and grievance to contentious and violent politics. It outlines how various characters embody, persevere, deflect, and work through grief of different sources, magnitudes, and expressions. At the same time, the essay considers the political meaning of death and mortality by using different characters’ experiences to consider how grief operates across different political registers and how it collapses distinctions between personal and political. The essay then explores how the franchise’s explorations of grief mirror, challenge, or reveal blank spots in US conceptions of loss, resentment, and mourning in war and how they reverberate politically. It argues that policy analysts’ reduction of people to their anger and resentment is an attempt to flatten and individualize their political behavior and motivations, rather than understanding these emotions as aspects of people’s multi-layered, communal and structural experiences of injustice and injury that feed into collective action.

The Forum
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Interdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.