Physician readiness for artificial intelligence integration in clinical screening and diagnosis

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly incorporated into clinical screening and diagnostic workflows worldwide. However, the effectiveness and safety of AI implementation depend largely on physicians’ readiness, including their knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers. In Saudi Arabia, where healthcare digital transformation is a strategic priority under Vision 2030, evidence regarding physician preparedness for AI-enabled clinical practice remains limited. A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians and medical interns working in governmental and private hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between February and April 2025. Data were collected using a validated, self-administered questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to AI use in clinical screening and diagnosis. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using International Business Machines Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26. A total of 435 physicians participated in the study. Although most respondents reported positive attitudes toward AI integration in clinical practice (83.7%), only half demonstrated good knowledge of AI concepts and applications (50.3%), indicating a clear readiness gap. Radiology (75.9%) and pathology (43.7%) were identified as the clinical areas with the greatest perceived potential for AI implementation. The most frequently reported barriers were insufficient training (58.9%) and lack of trust in AI systems (53.8%). In multivariate analysis, non-Saudi physicians were significantly more likely to exhibit positive attitudes toward AI adoption (adjusted odds ratio = 1.75, P = .047). Despite strong physician enthusiasm for AI, substantial gaps in knowledge and training persist, posing challenges to effective implementation in clinical practice. Addressing physician readiness through structured educational programs, trust-building strategies, and clear regulatory frameworks is essential to ensure safe, sustainable, and effective integration of AI into Saudi healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000050871
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Physician readiness for artificial intelligence integration in clinical screening and diagnosis

Ehab A. Abo Ali, Abdulhameed Abu Alsoud, Abdulrahim Alissa, Abdulelah K Alqawlaq et al.
Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Physician readiness for artificial intelligence integration in clinical screening and diagnosis

Ehab A. Abo Ali, Abdulhameed Abu Alsoud, Abdulrahim Alissa, Abdulelah K Alqawlaq, Lin Mazen Jolha, Rian Saeed Yahya, Fatma E. Hassan, Renad Ashraf Altaher, Mohamed Abouassad, Haneen Abu Alsoud, Lujain Waleed Alqabbaa, Joud Abdullah Albassam, Rebal Najeeb Khayyat, Malek Odah
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly incorporated into clinical screening and diagnostic workflows worldwide. However, the effectiveness and safety of AI implementation depend largely on physicians’ readiness, including their knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers. In Saudi Arabia, where healthcare digital transformation is a strategic priority under Vision 2030, evidence regarding physician preparedness for AI-enabled clinical practice remains limited. A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians and medical interns working in governmental and private hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between February and April 2025. Data were collected using a validated, self-administered questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to AI use in clinical screening and diagnosis. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using International Business Machines Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26. A total of 435 physicians participated in the study. Although most respondents reported positive attitudes toward AI integration in clinical practice (83.7%), only half demonstrated good knowledge of AI concepts and applications (50.3%), indicating a clear readiness gap. Radiology (75.9%) and pathology (43.7%) were identified as the clinical areas with the greatest perceived potential for AI implementation. The most frequently reported barriers were insufficient training (58.9%) and lack of trust in AI systems (53.8%). In multivariate analysis, non-Saudi physicians were significantly more likely to exhibit positive attitudes toward AI adoption (adjusted odds ratio = 1.75, P = .047). Despite strong physician enthusiasm for AI, substantial gaps in knowledge and training persist, posing challenges to effective implementation in clinical practice. Addressing physician readiness through structured educational programs, trust-building strategies, and clear regulatory frameworks is essential to ensure safe, sustainable, and effective integration of AI into Saudi healthcare systems.

MedicineVol. 105(39)
Cairo University (EG), Rashid Hospital (AE), Batterjee Medical College
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.