What makes speech sound non-native?

Abstract This study investigates how monolingual listeners evaluate the perceived nativeness of bilingual speech in the first (L1) and second language (L2), and which pronunciation cues underlie these judgments. English and German listeners rated the L1/L2 speech produced by L1 English-L2 German late bilinguals, alongside monolingual controls, and provided open-ended comments on perceived non-native features. Results showed that bilinguals were rated as less nativelike than monolinguals in both languages, with substantially greater deviations in the L2. Analyses of listener comments revealed a clear cross-linguistic dissociation: listeners relied more on prosodic cues when evaluating bilinguals’ L1 speech, and more on segmental cues in L2 pronunciation. These findings show that the relative weighting of perceptual cues differs depending on the overall nativelikeness of the speech signal. By combining nativeness ratings with explicit listener comments across both languages, this study provides new insights into the perceptual basis of L1 and L2 nativeness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.26046.kor
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

What makes speech sound non-native?

Lisa Kornder
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

What makes speech sound non-native?

Lisa Kornder
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates how monolingual listeners evaluate the perceived nativeness of bilingual speech in the first (L1) and second language (L2), and which pronunciation cues underlie these judgments. English and German listeners rated the L1/L2 speech produced by L1 English-L2 German late bilinguals, alongside monolingual controls, and provided open-ended comments on perceived non-native features. Results showed that bilinguals were rated as less nativelike than monolinguals in both languages, with substantially greater deviations in the L2. Analyses of listener comments revealed a clear cross-linguistic dissociation: listeners relied more on prosodic cues when evaluating bilinguals’ L1 speech, and more on segmental cues in L2 pronunciation. These findings show that the relative weighting of perceptual cues differs depending on the overall nativelikeness of the speech signal. By combining nativeness ratings with explicit listener comments across both languages, this study provides new insights into the perceptual basis of L1 and L2 nativeness.

Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
University of Graz (AT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.