Evaluating spectral unmixing techniques using imaging spectroscopy data for retrieval of green, non-photosynthetic vegetation, and soil fractional cover

Estimates of fractional cover of green vegetation (GV), non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV), and soil provide valuable information about the Earth system. As the new generation of Earth visible-to-shortwave infrared (VSWIR) imaging spectrometers take orbit, global fractional cover data will be obtainable with new and improved spectral unmixing algorithms. Using an ASD Field Spectrometer and the spectral line point intercept (SLPIT) method, we estimate fractional cover from field measurements to compare to contemporaneous airborne (Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer; AVIRIS NG ) and spaceborne (Earth surface Mineral dust source InvesTigation; EMIT) imaging spectroscopy data. Field data were collected in multiple biomes in the US Southwest at 84 validation sites. We used EndMember Combination Monte Carlo (E(MC) 2 ) and Multiple-Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis (MESMA) to derive fractional cover, two candidate spectral unmixing algorithms used by current (e.g., EMIT) and future imaging spectroscopy missions. Field data exhibited strong agreement between ground and spaceborne/airborne measurements. Our best spectral unmixing approach, E(MC) 2 , produced mean absolute error of ≤0.05 for NPV, GV, and soil with uncertainties ≤0.08 for all classes. We further investigated the performance of global vs. local endmember libraries and found that the global library outperformed the local endmember library. We investigated normalization techniques and their effectiveness with our ground and image fractions. Additionally, we calculated uncertainties from both ground and image fractions. Field results aligned well and within uncertainty predictions from previously reported simulation work. These findings support the use of E(MC) 2 to be used in current and future imaging spectroscopy missions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing of Environment
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2026.115681
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluating spectral unmixing techniques using imaging spectroscopy data for retrieval of green, non-photosynthetic vegetation, and soil fractional cover

Sandra LeGrand, Francisco Ochoa, Red Willow Coleman, Thoralf Meyer et al.
Remote Sensing of Environment
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Evaluating spectral unmixing techniques using imaging spectroscopy data for retrieval of green, non-photosynthetic vegetation, and soil fractional cover

Sandra LeGrand, Francisco Ochoa, Red Willow Coleman, Thoralf Meyer, Kathleen Grant, Yoseline Angel, Madeleine Gillespie, Philip G. Brodrick, Jorge A. Ochoa Gonzalez, David R. Thompson, Gregory S. Okin, Robert O. Green, K. Dana Chadwick, Regina Eckert
article en

Abstract

Estimates of fractional cover of green vegetation (GV), non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV), and soil provide valuable information about the Earth system. As the new generation of Earth visible-to-shortwave infrared (VSWIR) imaging spectrometers take orbit, global fractional cover data will be obtainable with new and improved spectral unmixing algorithms. Using an ASD Field Spectrometer and the spectral line point intercept (SLPIT) method, we estimate fractional cover from field measurements to compare to contemporaneous airborne (Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer; AVIRIS NG ) and spaceborne (Earth surface Mineral dust source InvesTigation; EMIT) imaging spectroscopy data. Field data were collected in multiple biomes in the US Southwest at 84 validation sites. We used EndMember Combination Monte Carlo (E(MC) 2 ) and Multiple-Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis (MESMA) to derive fractional cover, two candidate spectral unmixing algorithms used by current (e.g., EMIT) and future imaging spectroscopy missions. Field data exhibited strong agreement between ground and spaceborne/airborne measurements. Our best spectral unmixing approach, E(MC) 2 , produced mean absolute error of ≤0.05 for NPV, GV, and soil with uncertainties ≤0.08 for all classes. We further investigated the performance of global vs. local endmember libraries and found that the global library outperformed the local endmember library. We investigated normalization techniques and their effectiveness with our ground and image fractions. Additionally, we calculated uncertainties from both ground and image fractions. Field results aligned well and within uncertainty predictions from previously reported simulation work. These findings support the use of E(MC) 2 to be used in current and future imaging spectroscopy missions.

Remote Sensing of EnvironmentVol. 347
Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), United States Army (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.