Rectifying market externalities via AI policymaking

Abstract Traditional competitive markets do not account for negative externalities; indirect costs that some participants impose on others, such as the cost of over-appropriating a common-pool resource (which diminishes future stock, and thus harvest, for everyone). Quantifying appropriate interventions to market prices has proven to be quite challenging. We propose a practical approach to computing market prices and allocations via a deep reinforcement learning policymaker agent, operating in an environment of other learning agents. Our policymaker allows us to tune the prices with regard to diverse objectives such as sustainability and resource wastefulness, fairness, buyers’ and sellers’ welfare, etc. As a highlight of our findings, our policymaker is significantly more successful in maintaining resource sustainability , compared to the market equilibrium outcome, in scarce resource environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-026-09768-2
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Rectifying market externalities via AI policymaking

Milind Tambe, Panayiotis Danassis, Boi V. Faltings, Aris Filos-Ratsikas et al.
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

Rectifying market externalities via AI policymaking

Milind Tambe, Panayiotis Danassis, Boi V. Faltings, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Haipeng Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Traditional competitive markets do not account for negative externalities; indirect costs that some participants impose on others, such as the cost of over-appropriating a common-pool resource (which diminishes future stock, and thus harvest, for everyone). Quantifying appropriate interventions to market prices has proven to be quite challenging. We propose a practical approach to computing market prices and allocations via a deep reinforcement learning policymaker agent, operating in an environment of other learning agents. Our policymaker allows us to tune the prices with regard to diverse objectives such as sustainability and resource wastefulness, fairness, buyers’ and sellers’ welfare, etc. As a highlight of our findings, our policymaker is significantly more successful in maintaining resource sustainability , compared to the market equilibrium outcome, in scarce resource environments.

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent SystemsVol. 40(2)
Harvard University (US), William & Mary (US), University of Southampton (GB), Imperial College London (GB), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rectifying market externalities via AI policymaking — Milind Tambe, Panayiotis Danassis, et al. · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS