Aesthetics as boundary work: Art, science, and the pluralisation of expert knowledge for the global governance of sustainability

Abstract Applying a Science and Technology Studies (STS) lens and building on Rancièrian philosophy and the aesthetic turn in International Relations (IR), the article explores the possibilities that the mobilisation of knowledge from the artistic field holds for the pluralisation of expert knowledge-making in the global governance of sustainable development. Is the use of aesthetic knowledge production yet another effort to ‘art-wash’ a global governance agenda? Or does the opening of such new spaces of political exchange create the opportunity for collective knowledge production and political transformation? Moving beyond examining art as an instrument of science communication, the article discusses artworks as boundary objects, facilitating multivocality, interpretative flexibility, inclusivity, timeliness, and virtual reality, all achieved within the technocratic environment of a governing agenda where datafied expertise continues to dominate. Following such ‘new modalities of reflection’, 1 the article applies case study analysis of artworks exhibited at UN COP meetings in order to explore the dynamic interdependence of policy and art as spaces of expert knowledge production and democratic politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Studies
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210526102228
Primary Topic
Art, Technology, and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aesthetics as boundary work: Art, science, and the pluralisation of expert knowledge for the global governance of sustainability

Sotiria Grek
Review of International Studies
Art, Technology, and Culture
article

Aesthetics as boundary work: Art, science, and the pluralisation of expert knowledge for the global governance of sustainability

Sotiria Grek
article en

Abstract

Abstract Applying a Science and Technology Studies (STS) lens and building on Rancièrian philosophy and the aesthetic turn in International Relations (IR), the article explores the possibilities that the mobilisation of knowledge from the artistic field holds for the pluralisation of expert knowledge-making in the global governance of sustainable development. Is the use of aesthetic knowledge production yet another effort to ‘art-wash’ a global governance agenda? Or does the opening of such new spaces of political exchange create the opportunity for collective knowledge production and political transformation? Moving beyond examining art as an instrument of science communication, the article discusses artworks as boundary objects, facilitating multivocality, interpretative flexibility, inclusivity, timeliness, and virtual reality, all achieved within the technocratic environment of a governing agenda where datafied expertise continues to dominate. Following such ‘new modalities of reflection’, 1 the article applies case study analysis of artworks exhibited at UN COP meetings in order to explore the dynamic interdependence of policy and art as spaces of expert knowledge production and democratic politics.

Review of International Studies
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Art, Technology, and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.