Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Risk Through the Integration of Genetic Information and Artificial Intelligence‐Based Electrocardiogram Data

ABSTRACT Background Accurate prediction of atrial fibrillation (AF) is essential for prevention. The CHARGE‐AF score, based on routinely available clinical factors, provides a practical tool for estimating AF risk but has limited predictive accuracy. This study aimed to improve AF risk prediction by integrating artificial intelligence (AI)–based electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis of age and sex with genetic information in addition to established clinical risk factors. Methods We analyzed 39 478 UK Biobank participants without prior AF. A polygenic risk score for AF (AF‐PRS), the AI‐ECG age gap (AI‐ECG–predicted age minus chronological age), and AI‐ECG–predicted sex mismatch were evaluated on top of the CHARGE‐AF model. Model performance was compared across sequential prediction models. Results Over a median follow‐up of 2.7 years (interquartile range, 1.7–4.2; maximum, 6.7), 533 participants (1.3%) developed AF. AF‐PRS (HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.48–1.76) and the AI‐ECG age gap (HR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.24–1.51) were independently associated with incident AF. Compared with CHARGE‐AF alone (C‐index 0.708, 95% CI: 0.686–0.730), adding AF‐PRS improved discrimination (C‐index 0.743; Δ0.035, 95% CI: 0.021–0.049; p < 0.001). Adding traditional ECG parameters did not enhance performance, whereas incorporating AI‐ECG features (age gap and sex mismatch) into the combined clinical and genetic model provided additional gain in discrimination (C‐index 0.754; Δ0.045, 95% CI: 0.028–0.062), reclassification (net reclassification improvement 0.408), and discrimination improvement (0.007; all p < 0.001). Conclusions Integrating genetic risk and AI‐ECG–derived features enhances AF prediction beyond an established clinical model, supporting the use of combined digital and genetic biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Arrhythmia
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70463
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Risk Through the Integration of Genetic Information and Artificial Intelligence‐Based Electrocardiogram Data

Oh‐Seok Kwon, Hanjin Park, Jae‐Sun Uhm, Je‐Wook Park et al.
Journal of Arrhythmia
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Risk Through the Integration of Genetic Information and Artificial Intelligence‐Based Electrocardiogram Data

Oh‐Seok Kwon, Hanjin Park, Jae‐Sun Uhm, Je‐Wook Park, Boyoung Joung, Hui‐Nam Pak, Daehoon Kim, Hee Tae Yu, Pil‐Sung Yang, Tae‐Hoon Kim
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Accurate prediction of atrial fibrillation (AF) is essential for prevention. The CHARGE‐AF score, based on routinely available clinical factors, provides a practical tool for estimating AF risk but has limited predictive accuracy. This study aimed to improve AF risk prediction by integrating artificial intelligence (AI)–based electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis of age and sex with genetic information in addition to established clinical risk factors. Methods We analyzed 39 478 UK Biobank participants without prior AF. A polygenic risk score for AF (AF‐PRS), the AI‐ECG age gap (AI‐ECG–predicted age minus chronological age), and AI‐ECG–predicted sex mismatch were evaluated on top of the CHARGE‐AF model. Model performance was compared across sequential prediction models. Results Over a median follow‐up of 2.7 years (interquartile range, 1.7–4.2; maximum, 6.7), 533 participants (1.3%) developed AF. AF‐PRS (HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.48–1.76) and the AI‐ECG age gap (HR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.24–1.51) were independently associated with incident AF. Compared with CHARGE‐AF alone (C‐index 0.708, 95% CI: 0.686–0.730), adding AF‐PRS improved discrimination (C‐index 0.743; Δ0.035, 95% CI: 0.021–0.049; p < 0.001). Adding traditional ECG parameters did not enhance performance, whereas incorporating AI‐ECG features (age gap and sex mismatch) into the combined clinical and genetic model provided additional gain in discrimination (C‐index 0.754; Δ0.045, 95% CI: 0.028–0.062), reclassification (net reclassification improvement 0.408), and discrimination improvement (0.007; all p < 0.001). Conclusions Integrating genetic risk and AI‐ECG–derived features enhances AF prediction beyond an established clinical model, supporting the use of combined digital and genetic biomarkers for risk stratification.

Journal of ArrhythmiaVol. 42(5)
University Health System (US), Yonsei University Health System (KR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.