Does experience modulate automatic imitation? A new look

Automatic imitation is a stimulus-response compatibility effect wherein observing an action automatically influences motor performance. However, the mechanism underlying this effect remains controversial. Associative Sequence Learning suggests that automatic imitation arises from contingent visual and motor activity associations. Prior studies have shown that exposure to counter-imitative training can alter these visuomotor associations, suggesting that automatic imitation can be modulated by experience. Here, we aim to bring new insight into how this modulation occurs by exploring the time course of automatic imitation before and after counter-imitative training. If automatic imitation is merely a result of contingent associations, as previously suggested, the effect should consistently be modulated following such training. However, our findings show that automatic imitation is not significantly reduced after counter-imitative training at all the tested time points. This suggests that automatic imitation does not depend on contingent association, at least not as currently understood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357821
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Does experience modulate automatic imitation? A new look

Corrado Sinigaglia, Martina Fanghella, Guido Barchiesi, Francesca Genovese
PLoS ONE
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Does experience modulate automatic imitation? A new look

Corrado Sinigaglia, Martina Fanghella, Guido Barchiesi, Francesca Genovese
article en

Abstract

Automatic imitation is a stimulus-response compatibility effect wherein observing an action automatically influences motor performance. However, the mechanism underlying this effect remains controversial. Associative Sequence Learning suggests that automatic imitation arises from contingent visual and motor activity associations. Prior studies have shown that exposure to counter-imitative training can alter these visuomotor associations, suggesting that automatic imitation can be modulated by experience. Here, we aim to bring new insight into how this modulation occurs by exploring the time course of automatic imitation before and after counter-imitative training. If automatic imitation is merely a result of contingent associations, as previously suggested, the effect should consistently be modulated following such training. However, our findings show that automatic imitation is not significantly reduced after counter-imitative training at all the tested time points. This suggests that automatic imitation does not depend on contingent association, at least not as currently understood.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Philips (Finland) (FI), University of Milan (IT), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.