Treatment of Antithrombotic-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage in Adults: A Focused Guideline Update from the Neurocritical Care Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine

Abstract Background Antithrombotic-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening condition, and rapid treatment in the setting of antithrombotic agents may limit hematoma expansion and improve outcomes. This focused update evaluated the available evidence after publication of the 2016 guidelines. Methods The Neurocritical Care Society, in conjunction with the Society of Critical Care Medicine, generated five questions to guide a systematic review and meta-analysis. Three of these questions update prior recommendations, while two are newly introduced. Each question followed a Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) framework and focused on the management of acute ICH including spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) and traumatic ICH. The topics addressed were: (1) andexanet alfa versus 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for treatment of oral factor Xa inhibitor effects; (2) platelet transfusion versus no transfusion for treatment in the setting of antiplatelet agent use; (3) desmopressin versus no desmopressin for treatment in the setting of antiplatelet agent use; (4) treatment of anticoagulant effects versus no treatment in the setting of small IPH; and (5) use of viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs) to treat coagulopathy in traumatic ICH. Recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results The panel generated eight recommendations. For patients with acute ICH, the panel issued the following conditional recommendations: use 4F-PCC rather than andexanet alfa for the treatment of the anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors, avoid platelet transfusion in non-neurosurgical patients with spontaneous IPH on antiplatelet agents, administer platelet transfusion in patients with spontaneous IPH on aspirin who are undergoing surgery, and use VHAs to guide treatment of coagulopathy in traumatic ICH. The panel was unable to issue recommendations regarding platelet transfusion for treatment of antiplatelet effects in traumatic ICH, use of desmopressin for treatment of antiplatelet effects, or treatment of anticoagulant effects in small IPH. Conclusions The guideline writing panel provided new conditional recommendations for the treatment of antithrombotic-associated acute ICH. These recommendations are intended for consideration along with the patient’s clinical status and patient-specific factors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurocritical Care
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-026-02601-4
Primary Topic
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Treatment of Antithrombotic-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage in Adults: A Focused Guideline Update from the Neurocritical Care Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine

Sherif Hanafy Mahmoud, Emilie P. Belley-Côté, Kimia Honarmand, Monisha A. Kumar et al.
Neurocritical Care
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
article

Treatment of Antithrombotic-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage in Adults: A Focused Guideline Update from the Neurocritical Care Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine

Sherif Hanafy Mahmoud, Emilie P. Belley-Côté, Kimia Honarmand, Monisha A. Kumar, Meghan Caylor Vallejo, Veda K Chau, Bradley Dengler, Joseph D. Burns, Colleen Barthol, Adam Cuker, Lori S. Kennedy, Charlotte Cordonnier, M. Elizabeth Wilcox
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Antithrombotic-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening condition, and rapid treatment in the setting of antithrombotic agents may limit hematoma expansion and improve outcomes. This focused update evaluated the available evidence after publication of the 2016 guidelines. Methods The Neurocritical Care Society, in conjunction with the Society of Critical Care Medicine, generated five questions to guide a systematic review and meta-analysis. Three of these questions update prior recommendations, while two are newly introduced. Each question followed a Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) framework and focused on the management of acute ICH including spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) and traumatic ICH. The topics addressed were: (1) andexanet alfa versus 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for treatment of oral factor Xa inhibitor effects; (2) platelet transfusion versus no transfusion for treatment in the setting of antiplatelet agent use; (3) desmopressin versus no desmopressin for treatment in the setting of antiplatelet agent use; (4) treatment of anticoagulant effects versus no treatment in the setting of small IPH; and (5) use of viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs) to treat coagulopathy in traumatic ICH. Recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results The panel generated eight recommendations. For patients with acute ICH, the panel issued the following conditional recommendations: use 4F-PCC rather than andexanet alfa for the treatment of the anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors, avoid platelet transfusion in non-neurosurgical patients with spontaneous IPH on antiplatelet agents, administer platelet transfusion in patients with spontaneous IPH on aspirin who are undergoing surgery, and use VHAs to guide treatment of coagulopathy in traumatic ICH. The panel was unable to issue recommendations regarding platelet transfusion for treatment of antiplatelet effects in traumatic ICH, use of desmopressin for treatment of antiplatelet effects, or treatment of anticoagulant effects in small IPH. Conclusions The guideline writing panel provided new conditional recommendations for the treatment of antithrombotic-associated acute ICH. These recommendations are intended for consideration along with the patient’s clinical status and patient-specific factors.

Neurocritical Care
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.