Reconceptualizing Intergenerational Obligations in Confucian Family Contexts: A Reciprocal Ethics Framework for Family Theory

ABSTRACT This article develops reciprocal intergenerational ethics, a nontransactional framework for explaining how obligations between parents and adult children acquire moral force, limits, and negotiability in Confucian family contexts. Existing theories explain how intergenerational support is organized, exchanged, and contested but less often distinguish a culturally endorsed duty from the ethical warrant of a particular filial care claim. Drawing on Confucian role ethics, especially the reciprocal relation between filial responsibility ( xiao ) and parental care ( ci ), I treat filial obligation as a relationally conditioned claim rather than a fixed status duty. Six propositions specify ethical warrant, moral reciprocity, proportionality, ambivalence, constrained hierarchy, and life‐course accountability. The framework links parental and filial responsibilities without reducing reciprocity to repayment and clarifies how structural constraints shape the forms care can reasonably take.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.70092
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Reconceptualizing Intergenerational Obligations in Confucian Family Contexts: A Reciprocal Ethics Framework for Family Theory

Longlong Zhao
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

Reconceptualizing Intergenerational Obligations in Confucian Family Contexts: A Reciprocal Ethics Framework for Family Theory

Longlong Zhao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article develops reciprocal intergenerational ethics, a nontransactional framework for explaining how obligations between parents and adult children acquire moral force, limits, and negotiability in Confucian family contexts. Existing theories explain how intergenerational support is organized, exchanged, and contested but less often distinguish a culturally endorsed duty from the ethical warrant of a particular filial care claim. Drawing on Confucian role ethics, especially the reciprocal relation between filial responsibility ( xiao ) and parental care ( ci ), I treat filial obligation as a relationally conditioned claim rather than a fixed status duty. Six propositions specify ethical warrant, moral reciprocity, proportionality, ambivalence, constrained hierarchy, and life‐course accountability. The framework links parental and filial responsibilities without reducing reciprocity to repayment and clarifies how structural constraints shape the forms care can reasonably take.

Journal of Family Theory & Review
Nanjing Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reconceptualizing Intergenerational Obligations in Confucian Family Contexts: A Reciprocal Ethics Framework for Family Theory — Longlong Zhao · Journal of Family Theory & Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS