Jehovah's Witnesses in Africa: Documented Deaths, Medical Harm, and the Human Cost of Religious Doctrine

Ehovah's Witnesses are known worldwide for their distinctive doctrine concerning blood. For decades, members were instructed to refuse blood transfusions. The doctrine was not limited to ordinary medical preferences. It could apply even when physicians considered transfusion necessary to save a person's life. The consequences have been documented in African hospitals, courtrooms and medical literature. The evidence includes deaths. It includes children whose parents refused transfusion. It includes pregnant women facing life-threatening haemorrhage. It includes patients with severe anaemia. It includes court proceedings in which judges or public authorities intervened because religious objections placed a child's life at risk. And it includes cases in which the courts had to decide whether a patient's religious refusal should prevail over medical judgement. The issue therefore deserves examination as a public-health, medical-ethics and child-protection question.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22937239
Primary Topic
Blood donation and transfusion practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Jehovah's Witnesses in Africa: Documented Deaths, Medical Harm, and the Human Cost of Religious Doctrine

TRUSTIN NYOWIKEH MBUH
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Blood donation and transfusion practices
article

Jehovah's Witnesses in Africa: Documented Deaths, Medical Harm, and the Human Cost of Religious Doctrine

TRUSTIN NYOWIKEH MBUH
article en

Abstract

Ehovah's Witnesses are known worldwide for their distinctive doctrine concerning blood. For decades, members were instructed to refuse blood transfusions. The doctrine was not limited to ordinary medical preferences. It could apply even when physicians considered transfusion necessary to save a person's life. The consequences have been documented in African hospitals, courtrooms and medical literature. The evidence includes deaths. It includes children whose parents refused transfusion. It includes pregnant women facing life-threatening haemorrhage. It includes patients with severe anaemia. It includes court proceedings in which judges or public authorities intervened because religious objections placed a child's life at risk. And it includes cases in which the courts had to decide whether a patient's religious refusal should prevail over medical judgement. The issue therefore deserves examination as a public-health, medical-ethics and child-protection question.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Blood donation and transfusion practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.