Continuity or change? Who sets the narratives on European integration

Narratives of European integration are far from being constructed in Brussels alone; rather, a plurality of actors, including national governments, political parties and citizens shape them. Despite disagreement over the reasons for belonging to the EU and specific policies, especially in the ‘polycrisis’ era, pro-integration narratives remain broadly resilient. The main challenge comes from radical-right Eurosceptic actors, whose contestation takes different forms: some reject membership outright, while others challenge the integration process from within. The latter may be no less disruptive, as they can undermine the EU’s legal order through the mobilisation of national constitutional identities against EU primacy. Brexit is the only case in which both strategies combined, reflecting a transactional approach to membership, the activation of a domestic cleavage by a political entrepreneur, and the absence of constitutional review. The resilience of pro-integration narratives may reflect both public support and political elites’ capacity to shape and instrumentalise it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Integration
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2026.2733487
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Continuity or change? Who sets the narratives on European integration

Gisela Hernández
Journal of European Integration
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Continuity or change? Who sets the narratives on European integration

Gisela Hernández
article en

Abstract

Narratives of European integration are far from being constructed in Brussels alone; rather, a plurality of actors, including national governments, political parties and citizens shape them. Despite disagreement over the reasons for belonging to the EU and specific policies, especially in the ‘polycrisis’ era, pro-integration narratives remain broadly resilient. The main challenge comes from radical-right Eurosceptic actors, whose contestation takes different forms: some reject membership outright, while others challenge the integration process from within. The latter may be no less disruptive, as they can undermine the EU’s legal order through the mobilisation of national constitutional identities against EU primacy. Brexit is the only case in which both strategies combined, reflecting a transactional approach to membership, the activation of a domestic cleavage by a political entrepreneur, and the absence of constitutional review. The resilience of pro-integration narratives may reflect both public support and political elites’ capacity to shape and instrumentalise it.

Journal of European Integration
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Continuity or change? Who sets the narratives on European integration — Gisela Hernández · Journal of European Integration (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS