How many handednesses: The importance of preference and limb lateralization for the handedness phenotype

The phenotype of human handedness is likely to be a product of the ecological conditions experienced by our ancestors, with different forms of handedness having different fitness costs and benefits. Human hands, limbs, and bodies move in a coordinated fashion, so that hand lateralization is likely to have also entailed the evolution of limb and body lateralization. Consequently, we suggest that a measure of handedness should incorporate measures of limb lateralization. Measures of handedness that do not represent these differences may not capture the functional properties of an individual’s hand use, or the types of handedness that were selected for in ancestral environments. The advantages of measuring lateral preference rather than skill are also highlighted. Finally, we suggest that to determine categories from continuously measured data, it may be better to use algorithmic analysis techniques, such as cluster analysis, latent class analysis, or dual Weibull mixture models. These reduce researcher degrees of freedom, while being able to capture the dimensional and categorical nature of handedness. Ultimately, methods to determine handedness should be suited to the specific research question, and no single method may suit all circumstances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650x.2026.2735856
Primary Topic
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

How many handednesses: The importance of preference and limb lateralization for the handedness phenotype

Paul Rodway, Astrid Schepman
Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
article

How many handednesses: The importance of preference and limb lateralization for the handedness phenotype

Paul Rodway, Astrid Schepman
article en

Abstract

The phenotype of human handedness is likely to be a product of the ecological conditions experienced by our ancestors, with different forms of handedness having different fitness costs and benefits. Human hands, limbs, and bodies move in a coordinated fashion, so that hand lateralization is likely to have also entailed the evolution of limb and body lateralization. Consequently, we suggest that a measure of handedness should incorporate measures of limb lateralization. Measures of handedness that do not represent these differences may not capture the functional properties of an individual’s hand use, or the types of handedness that were selected for in ancestral environments. The advantages of measuring lateral preference rather than skill are also highlighted. Finally, we suggest that to determine categories from continuously measured data, it may be better to use algorithmic analysis techniques, such as cluster analysis, latent class analysis, or dual Weibull mixture models. These reduce researcher degrees of freedom, while being able to capture the dimensional and categorical nature of handedness. Ultimately, methods to determine handedness should be suited to the specific research question, and no single method may suit all circumstances.

Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
University of Chester (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.