The impact of financing cost differences on global energy and industry decarbonization

Abstract Integrated assessment models usually neglect differences in financing conditions across countries, sectors and time. This omission could distort outcomes concerning electricity generation and also other sectors. Here we estimate and implement dynamic, country-specific cost of capital (CoC) for eight energy and industry sectors in the IMAGE integrated assessment model. Compared with assuming a uniform low-risk CoC, accounting for developing countries’ investment risks increases global mitigation costs through 2100 for staying well below +2 °C by around 9% and shifts cost-effective mitigation efforts to lower-risk regions. Sector-level analysis shows that using granular CoC estimates reduces grid investments in developing countries, shifts centralized heat production towards natural gas and raises green hydrogen costs, slowing electrolysis uptake. In industries such as steel and cement, sector and country risks hinder capital-intensive carbon capture and electricity-based technologies. Our results reveal biases from omitting country-specific financing conditions and highlight the need for climate finance across many sectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Climate Change
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02756-0
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The impact of financing cost differences on global energy and industry decarbonization

Paul Waidelich, Bjarne Steffen, Harmen Sytze de Boer, Paul Tautorat et al.
Nature Climate Change
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

The impact of financing cost differences on global energy and industry decarbonization

Paul Waidelich, Bjarne Steffen, Harmen Sytze de Boer, Paul Tautorat, Detlef Peter van Vuuren, Constance Crassier
article en

Abstract

Abstract Integrated assessment models usually neglect differences in financing conditions across countries, sectors and time. This omission could distort outcomes concerning electricity generation and also other sectors. Here we estimate and implement dynamic, country-specific cost of capital (CoC) for eight energy and industry sectors in the IMAGE integrated assessment model. Compared with assuming a uniform low-risk CoC, accounting for developing countries’ investment risks increases global mitigation costs through 2100 for staying well below +2 °C by around 9% and shifts cost-effective mitigation efforts to lower-risk regions. Sector-level analysis shows that using granular CoC estimates reduces grid investments in developing countries, shifts centralized heat production towards natural gas and raises green hydrogen costs, slowing electrolysis uptake. In industries such as steel and cement, sector and country risks hinder capital-intensive carbon capture and electricity-based technologies. Our results reveal biases from omitting country-specific financing conditions and highlight the need for climate finance across many sectors.

Nature Climate Change
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL), Utrecht University (NL), ETH Zurich (CH), Nexira (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of financing cost differences on global energy and industry decarbonization — Paul Waidelich, Bjarne Steffen, et al. · Nature Climate Change (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS