Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Tissue Loss Undergoing Infrainguinal Endovascular Revascularization: Insights From the SWEDEPAD-1 Trial

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and tissue loss (Rutherford 5-6) are at high risk of major amputation. Drug-coated technologies are effective in coronary interventions, but their impact on limb outcomes in advanced ischemia remains uncertain. We evaluated whether drug-coated devices improve limb salvage in this high-risk population. METHODS: This post hoc subgroup analysis used data from SWEDEPAD-1 (Swedish Drug-Elution Trial in Peripheral Arterial Disease), a multicenter registry-based randomized controlled trial of endovascular treatment for infrainguinal arterial disease. Adults with chronic limb-threatening ischemia were randomized 1:1 to treatment with paclitaxel-coated or uncoated endovascular devices. Only patients with tissue loss (Rutherford 5 or 6) were included. The primary end point was time to ipsilateral major amputation. Secondary end points were target vessel reintervention and a composite of major amputation or target vessel reintervention. Outcomes were assessed at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years using intention-to-treat analyses and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 1761 patients (median age, 77 years; 60.1% male; 58.4% diabetes), ipsilateral major amputation within 3 months was more frequent in the paclitaxel-coated group than in the uncoated group (10.4% versus 7.5%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.04-1.96]). Amputation rates were similar at 1 year (16.3% versus 14.6%) and remained comparable through 5 years. Target vessel reintervention at 1 year was lower with paclitaxel-coated devices (13.6% versus 18.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.61-0.97]), but this difference was attenuated when early limb loss was included in a composite end point. No significant between-group differences were observed at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and tissue loss, paclitaxel-coated devices did not improve limb salvage and were associated with a higher early risk of major amputation. Although target vessel reintervention was reduced at 1 year, this apparent benefit was not maintained when accounting for the competing risk of limb loss in a composite end point. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02051088.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.126.016977
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Tissue Loss Undergoing Infrainguinal Endovascular Revascularization: Insights From the SWEDEPAD-1 Trial

Christian Smedberg, Per Törnqvist, Gustaf Tegler, Martin Delle et al.
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Tissue Loss Undergoing Infrainguinal Endovascular Revascularization: Insights From the SWEDEPAD-1 Trial

Christian Smedberg, Per Törnqvist, Gustaf Tegler, Martin Delle, Anna Hilbertson, Eva Jacobsson, Knut Thorbjørnsen, Joakim Nordanstig, Joachim Starck, Björn Kragsterman, Stefan Mellander, Hans I. V. Lindgren, Mårten Falkenberg, Johan Lindbäck, Per Skoog, Tom Le Corvec, Fredrik Sellgren, Maria Truedson, Andreas Öjersjö, Jonas Wallinder, Stefan Karl James, Torbjörn Fransson, Manne Andersson, Mattias Andersson, Horer Tal, Carl-Magnus Wahlgren, Robert Olin, Birgitta Sigvant, Jan Engström
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and tissue loss (Rutherford 5-6) are at high risk of major amputation. Drug-coated technologies are effective in coronary interventions, but their impact on limb outcomes in advanced ischemia remains uncertain. We evaluated whether drug-coated devices improve limb salvage in this high-risk population. METHODS: This post hoc subgroup analysis used data from SWEDEPAD-1 (Swedish Drug-Elution Trial in Peripheral Arterial Disease), a multicenter registry-based randomized controlled trial of endovascular treatment for infrainguinal arterial disease. Adults with chronic limb-threatening ischemia were randomized 1:1 to treatment with paclitaxel-coated or uncoated endovascular devices. Only patients with tissue loss (Rutherford 5 or 6) were included. The primary end point was time to ipsilateral major amputation. Secondary end points were target vessel reintervention and a composite of major amputation or target vessel reintervention. Outcomes were assessed at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years using intention-to-treat analyses and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 1761 patients (median age, 77 years; 60.1% male; 58.4% diabetes), ipsilateral major amputation within 3 months was more frequent in the paclitaxel-coated group than in the uncoated group (10.4% versus 7.5%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.04-1.96]). Amputation rates were similar at 1 year (16.3% versus 14.6%) and remained comparable through 5 years. Target vessel reintervention at 1 year was lower with paclitaxel-coated devices (13.6% versus 18.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.61-0.97]), but this difference was attenuated when early limb loss was included in a composite end point. No significant between-group differences were observed at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and tissue loss, paclitaxel-coated devices did not improve limb salvage and were associated with a higher early risk of major amputation. Although target vessel reintervention was reduced at 1 year, this apparent benefit was not maintained when accounting for the competing risk of limb loss in a composite end point. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02051088.

Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Linköping University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Malmö University (SE), Lund University (SE), Kristianstad University (SE), Örebro University (SE), Sundsvall Municipality (SE), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Sunderby sjukhus (SE), Stockholm South General Hospital (SE), NU Hospital Group (SE), Västmanlands sjukhus Västerås (SE), Södra Älvsborg Hospital (SE), Helsingborgs lasarett (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Landstinget i Kalmar län (SE), Gävle Hospital (SE), Ryhov Hospital Jönköping (SE), Hallands sjukhus Halmstad (SE), Centre for Research and Development (ZW), Karlstad University (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE), Umeå University (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.