Linking Smart City Strategies, Urban Brand Identity, and Territorial Attractiveness: An Integrative Conceptual Framework

Smart city strategies are increasingly used not only to improve urban services but also to shape intercity positioning, place reputation, and territorial attractiveness. However, the mechanisms through which digital and governance capabilities become credible and socially recognized urban brand assets remain insufficiently specified. This review develops an integrative conceptual framework linking smart city capability portfolios, stakeholder-experienced urban value, institutional urban brand identity, symbolic capital, territorial attractiveness, and durable urban competitiveness. A structured narrative review and concept-centric framework-building design synthesizes 77 substantive scientific and institutional sources; three additional methodological references support the review design. The revised framework specifies a serial but non-deterministic pathway from capability to experienced value, institutional identity and identity congruence, symbolic recognition, attraction, and resource embedding, while also allowing direct experienced-value effects. The synthesis groups the evidence into five capability domains, four forms of stakeholder-experienced value, and three symbolic-capital formation processes and assigns inclusion, co-creation, communication credibility, contextual fit, and multi-level governance to specific conversion paths. The reviewed literature suggests that technology does not create brand value automatically: smart-city capabilities are more likely to support identity and attractiveness when they generate useful, inclusive, visible, and contextually relevant experiences and when identity claims remain consistent with independently observable performance. The contribution therefore lies not in asserting a previously unknown link between smart cities and place branding but in specifying construct boundaries, conversion mechanisms, and empirically testable path-specific propositions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Science
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10100553
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Linking Smart City Strategies, Urban Brand Identity, and Territorial Attractiveness: An Integrative Conceptual Framework

М.И. Имамвердиева, Александр Александрович Гардт, Oleg S. Sutormin, Оксана Чуланова et al.
Urban Science
Smart Cities and Technologies
article

Linking Smart City Strategies, Urban Brand Identity, and Territorial Attractiveness: An Integrative Conceptual Framework

М.И. Имамвердиева, Александр Александрович Гардт, Oleg S. Sutormin, Оксана Чуланова, Ruslan Ya. Bajbulatov, A. A. Zagrebina
article en

Abstract

Smart city strategies are increasingly used not only to improve urban services but also to shape intercity positioning, place reputation, and territorial attractiveness. However, the mechanisms through which digital and governance capabilities become credible and socially recognized urban brand assets remain insufficiently specified. This review develops an integrative conceptual framework linking smart city capability portfolios, stakeholder-experienced urban value, institutional urban brand identity, symbolic capital, territorial attractiveness, and durable urban competitiveness. A structured narrative review and concept-centric framework-building design synthesizes 77 substantive scientific and institutional sources; three additional methodological references support the review design. The revised framework specifies a serial but non-deterministic pathway from capability to experienced value, institutional identity and identity congruence, symbolic recognition, attraction, and resource embedding, while also allowing direct experienced-value effects. The synthesis groups the evidence into five capability domains, four forms of stakeholder-experienced value, and three symbolic-capital formation processes and assigns inclusion, co-creation, communication credibility, contextual fit, and multi-level governance to specific conversion paths. The reviewed literature suggests that technology does not create brand value automatically: smart-city capabilities are more likely to support identity and attractiveness when they generate useful, inclusive, visible, and contextually relevant experiences and when identity claims remain consistent with independently observable performance. The contribution therefore lies not in asserting a previously unknown link between smart cities and place branding but in specifying construct boundaries, conversion mechanisms, and empirically testable path-specific propositions.

Urban ScienceVol. 10(10)
Surgut State University (RU), Siberian Federal University (RU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Smart Cities and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.