Nutri Veggie Index: An Innovative Nutrition Classification Scheme for Quality Assessment of Plant-Based Meat Analogues

Growing availability and consumption of plant-based meat analogues (PBMAs) have highlighted the need for nutritional assessment tools specifically designed to address the unique characteristics of these products. This study aimed to develop a nutritional quality assessment tool for PBMAs and to evaluate its applicability, agreement with existing nutritional classification schemes, and usability among nutrition professionals. The Nutritional Quality Index for Plant-Based Meat Analogues (NCS–Nutri Veggie Index) was developed based on expert consensus recommendations and existing nutritional assessment frameworks. The index evaluates seven domains: front-of-package nutrition labeling, characteristics associated with protein quality and quantity, lipid composition, sodium content, dietary fiber, micronutrient fortification, and the inclusion of sociobiodiversity ingredients, generating scores ranging from 0 to 100 and classifying products from A (excellent) to E (poor nutritional quality). NCS–Nutri Veggie Index was applied to 334 PBMA. Among the products evaluated, most foods had intermediate nutritional quality (C), corresponding to 53.0% (n = 177), followed by good quality (B), 33.5% (n = 112). NCS–Nutri Veggie Index showed substantial or excellent agreement with Nutri-Score and the Pan American Health Organization Nutrient Profile Model. The usability questionnaire demonstrated acceptable internal consistency across all evaluated domains. These findings indicate that the tool developed for these products is capable of indicating their nutritional quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15193416
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Nutri Veggie Index: An Innovative Nutrition Classification Scheme for Quality Assessment of Plant-Based Meat Analogues

Mariana Frazão Batista, Daniel Henrique Bandoni, Nathália Tarossi Locatelli, Veridiana Vera de Rosso et al.
Foods
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Nutri Veggie Index: An Innovative Nutrition Classification Scheme for Quality Assessment of Plant-Based Meat Analogues

Mariana Frazão Batista, Daniel Henrique Bandoni, Nathália Tarossi Locatelli, Veridiana Vera de Rosso, Sarah Polezi
article en

Abstract

Growing availability and consumption of plant-based meat analogues (PBMAs) have highlighted the need for nutritional assessment tools specifically designed to address the unique characteristics of these products. This study aimed to develop a nutritional quality assessment tool for PBMAs and to evaluate its applicability, agreement with existing nutritional classification schemes, and usability among nutrition professionals. The Nutritional Quality Index for Plant-Based Meat Analogues (NCS–Nutri Veggie Index) was developed based on expert consensus recommendations and existing nutritional assessment frameworks. The index evaluates seven domains: front-of-package nutrition labeling, characteristics associated with protein quality and quantity, lipid composition, sodium content, dietary fiber, micronutrient fortification, and the inclusion of sociobiodiversity ingredients, generating scores ranging from 0 to 100 and classifying products from A (excellent) to E (poor nutritional quality). NCS–Nutri Veggie Index was applied to 334 PBMA. Among the products evaluated, most foods had intermediate nutritional quality (C), corresponding to 53.0% (n = 177), followed by good quality (B), 33.5% (n = 112). NCS–Nutri Veggie Index showed substantial or excellent agreement with Nutri-Score and the Pan American Health Organization Nutrient Profile Model. The usability questionnaire demonstrated acceptable internal consistency across all evaluated domains. These findings indicate that the tool developed for these products is capable of indicating their nutritional quality.

FoodsVol. 15(19)
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.