Agreement and Systematic Differences Between Intraoperative ROSA Hip-Knee-Ankle Measurements and Standing Radiographic Alignment After Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Agreement Study
Background/Objectives: Intraoperative robotic hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) measurements are obtained with the patient supine under operative conditions and may not directly represent postoperative standing weight-bearing alignment. This study quantified the correspondence and systematic differences between intraoperative ROSA HKA and standing radiographic HKA after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 208 knees from 178 consecutive patients, including 30 bilateral patients. The primary comparison was post-trial-component intraoperative ROSA HKA versus postoperative standing radiographic HKA; the secondary comparison was pre-cut intraoperative ROSA HKA versus preoperative standing radiographic HKA. Patient-cluster bootstrap confidence intervals used 10,000 resamples. Agreement was evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis, absolute-agreement ICC(A,1), and weighted kappa; Spearman ρ described association. Results: For the primary comparison, mean bias (ROSA minus radiographic HKA) was −1.75° (95% CI −2.08 to −1.43°), conventional limits of agreement were −6.36° to 2.85°, and ICC(A,1) was 0.472 (95% CI 0.379 to 0.557). Differences were within 3° in 70.2% of knees and exceeded 3° in 29.8%; proportional bias was present (slope −0.569, p < 0.001). The secondary comparison showed bias 0.97° and ICC(A,1) 0.956. Exact femoral and tibial size agreement was 42.3% and 80.8%, respectively. The standardized surgeon-entered 10 mm starting value was retained in 57.7% of knees. These systematic and angle-dependent differences may partly reflect the differing loading, positioning, and measurement conditions between the intraoperative trial construct and postoperative standing radiography. Conclusions: Post-trial-component ROSA HKA showed systematic and angle-dependent differences from postoperative standing HKA and should not be considered interchangeable with, or a fixed patient-level predictor of, postoperative standing alignment.
Authors
- Wei‐Cheng Tseng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3528-8633)
- Cheng‐Chi Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3009-6571)
- Chung‐Yuh Tzeng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6415-8670)
- Kao‐Chang Tu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4135-264X)
- Cheng-Jung Ho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9049-3675)
- Ching‐Heng Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2450-6108)
- Yu-Tsung Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-5168)
- Kun-Hui Chen
- Cheng-Hung Lee
Institutions
- Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
- National Chung Hsing University (TW)
- Tunghai University (TW)
- Providence University (TW)
- China Medical University (TW)
- Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
- Kang-Ning Junior College of Medical Care and Management (TW)
- Hungkuang University (TW)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Published
- 2026-09-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15197432
- Primary Topic
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00