Practical learnings from a research engagement process involving youth with lived experience of suicidality

Suicide remains a leading cause of death among youth in Canada, yet youth with lived experience are rarely involved in shaping suicide research activities, data interpretation, or reporting. This commentary, co-authored with youth advisors from an integrated youth services initiative in British Columbia, presents a case example of youth engagement in suicide-related research. Drawing on participatory and relational approaches, we reflect on how youth engagement informed the interpretation of administrative data, encouraged more thoughtful approaches to suicide reporting, and highlighted practical considerations for relational and ethical engagement. We emphasize that ethical research on suicide must move beyond risk avoidance towards more transparent and youth-centred partnerships to enhance health services and policy recommendations for suicide prevention. Research and reporting on youth suicide often leave out the voices of young people who have lived through these experiences. When this happens, findings can lack important context and may unintentionally reinforce stigma or misunderstanding. In this commentary, we reflect on what we learned by working together as researchers and youth partners in suicide-related research. Youth shared perspectives that helped us think more carefully about how suicide-related findings are interpreted, communicated, and practically used. We also describe what helped create a safe and supportive engagement process, including relationship-based, trauma-informed approaches built on trust, flexibility, and open communication. Based on our experience, we offer practical lessons for researchers, organizations, and policy partners who want to meaningfully engage youth in suicide research and other sensitive topics. Ultimately, we argue that ethical youth engagement requires more than inviting young people to participate; it requires creating transparent, supportive partnerships that recognize youth as valued collaborators throughout the research process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Involvement and Engagement
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-026-00984-4
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Practical learnings from a research engagement process involving youth with lived experience of suicidality

Katherine G. Hastings, Jeanna Pillainayagam, Emily Jenkins, Bridget Young et al.
Research Involvement and Engagement
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Practical learnings from a research engagement process involving youth with lived experience of suicidality

Katherine G. Hastings, Jeanna Pillainayagam, Emily Jenkins, Bridget Young, Jodh Ghuman, Ayah Has, Irha Kashifa Asim, Skye Barbic, Amir Ashtari
article en

Abstract

Suicide remains a leading cause of death among youth in Canada, yet youth with lived experience are rarely involved in shaping suicide research activities, data interpretation, or reporting. This commentary, co-authored with youth advisors from an integrated youth services initiative in British Columbia, presents a case example of youth engagement in suicide-related research. Drawing on participatory and relational approaches, we reflect on how youth engagement informed the interpretation of administrative data, encouraged more thoughtful approaches to suicide reporting, and highlighted practical considerations for relational and ethical engagement. We emphasize that ethical research on suicide must move beyond risk avoidance towards more transparent and youth-centred partnerships to enhance health services and policy recommendations for suicide prevention. Research and reporting on youth suicide often leave out the voices of young people who have lived through these experiences. When this happens, findings can lack important context and may unintentionally reinforce stigma or misunderstanding. In this commentary, we reflect on what we learned by working together as researchers and youth partners in suicide-related research. Youth shared perspectives that helped us think more carefully about how suicide-related findings are interpreted, communicated, and practically used. We also describe what helped create a safe and supportive engagement process, including relationship-based, trauma-informed approaches built on trust, flexibility, and open communication. Based on our experience, we offer practical lessons for researchers, organizations, and policy partners who want to meaningfully engage youth in suicide research and other sensitive topics. Ultimately, we argue that ethical youth engagement requires more than inviting young people to participate; it requires creating transparent, supportive partnerships that recognize youth as valued collaborators throughout the research process.

Research Involvement and EngagementVol. 12(1)
Providence Health Care (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), Spinal Cord Injury BC (CA), Foundry Vancouver-Granville (CA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.