Rural Discontent and Disruptive Politics: A Spatial Justice Perspective

This thematic intervention proposes the adoption of a spatial justice framework to examine the drivers of rural support for disruptive political movements and their implications for environmental action. Disruptive parties, especially on the right, have adopted climate-sceptic stances against net zero policies, attributed to the courting of rural support. Yet, the relationship between rural discontent and disruptive politics is not fully understood. The article defines disruptive politics and positions it as part of a wider ‘politics of feeling’. As such, it argues, rural support for disruptive politics cannot be explained by political-economic characteristics or material inequalities, but results from voters interpreting politics through a lens of ‘rural consciousness’ in which rural communities are perceived to be unfairly treated by urban-centred politics and neglected by established parties and institutions. This framing reflects a perception of spatial injustice. The article outlines how spatial justice as a multidimensional concept can provide insights into experiences and perceptions of rural-urban equalities and threats to the ‘right to the rural’, as well as into the consequences of rural populism in compromising the right to the rural of minorities, and provide a normative framework for exploring alternative responses to rural grievances that are more inclusive and empowering.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Environmental Geography
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27539687261488823
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Rural Discontent and Disruptive Politics: A Spatial Justice Perspective

Michael Woods
Progress in Environmental Geography
Rural development and sustainability
article

Rural Discontent and Disruptive Politics: A Spatial Justice Perspective

Michael Woods
article en

Abstract

This thematic intervention proposes the adoption of a spatial justice framework to examine the drivers of rural support for disruptive political movements and their implications for environmental action. Disruptive parties, especially on the right, have adopted climate-sceptic stances against net zero policies, attributed to the courting of rural support. Yet, the relationship between rural discontent and disruptive politics is not fully understood. The article defines disruptive politics and positions it as part of a wider ‘politics of feeling’. As such, it argues, rural support for disruptive politics cannot be explained by political-economic characteristics or material inequalities, but results from voters interpreting politics through a lens of ‘rural consciousness’ in which rural communities are perceived to be unfairly treated by urban-centred politics and neglected by established parties and institutions. This framing reflects a perception of spatial injustice. The article outlines how spatial justice as a multidimensional concept can provide insights into experiences and perceptions of rural-urban equalities and threats to the ‘right to the rural’, as well as into the consequences of rural populism in compromising the right to the rural of minorities, and provide a normative framework for exploring alternative responses to rural grievances that are more inclusive and empowering.

Progress in Environmental Geography
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.