Where Do Proteomics People Come from?

Abstract The field of proteomics is one of the fastest-growing scientific disciplines in the world today. Beginning in 2020, ambitious market predictions anticipated proteomics to more than double in market size in 4–6 years and to even surpass the well-established genomic sciences industry in 8–12 years. While the market is still growing, it has not come close to matching the initial projections. To better understand the root cause of this, the author has collected field surveys and direct interviews of over 200 scientists actively involved in proteomics research today. While ultimately incomplete, it is worth noting that over 68% of respondents received their technical training in proteomics during either their doctoral or postdoctoral training. In stark contrast, only 4.3% of students obtained training during their undergraduate education. Given the 5.7-to-9.4-year average cycle for traditional doctoral and postdoctoral training in the life sciences, it appears the limiting factor in growing the proteomics field may be linked directly to current practices in training a qualified workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.6c00268
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Where Do Proteomics People Come from?

Benjamin C. Orsburn
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
article

Where Do Proteomics People Come from?

Benjamin C. Orsburn
article en

Abstract

Abstract The field of proteomics is one of the fastest-growing scientific disciplines in the world today. Beginning in 2020, ambitious market predictions anticipated proteomics to more than double in market size in 4–6 years and to even surpass the well-established genomic sciences industry in 8–12 years. While the market is still growing, it has not come close to matching the initial projections. To better understand the root cause of this, the author has collected field surveys and direct interviews of over 200 scientists actively involved in proteomics research today. While ultimately incomplete, it is worth noting that over 68% of respondents received their technical training in proteomics during either their doctoral or postdoctoral training. In stark contrast, only 4.3% of students obtained training during their undergraduate education. Given the 5.7-to-9.4-year average cycle for traditional doctoral and postdoctoral training in the life sciences, it appears the limiting factor in growing the proteomics field may be linked directly to current practices in training a qualified workforce.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Where Do Proteomics People Come from? — Benjamin C. Orsburn · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS