When Automated Vehicles Cannot Retaliate: Driver-Initiated Takeover Under Aggression in Mixed Traffic

When exposed to aggression from surrounding human-driven vehicles (HDVs), automated vehicles (AVs) with conditional automation adopt defensive responses. However, human drivers may expect to respond with emotion-driven, retaliatory behaviors. This discrepancy between human drivers’ expectations and AV behavior may lead to driver-initiated takeovers, introducing abrupt control transitions and retaliatory driving that threaten traffic safety. In a driving simulator study with 42 licensed drivers, participants experienced different aggressive events (honking, tailgating, and sharp braking) under low and high aggression levels. The results indicated that drivers perceived higher levels of aggression and were more likely to initiate takeovers during sharp braking compared to honking and tailgating, as well as under higher aggression levels. The differences in perceived aggression across event types diminished as the aggression level increased. These findings provide insights into when and why drivers override defensive automation and offer implications for the design of AV behavior in mixed-traffic environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261484482
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

When Automated Vehicles Cannot Retaliate: Driver-Initiated Takeover Under Aggression in Mixed Traffic

Yiqi Zhang, Haitao Chen
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

When Automated Vehicles Cannot Retaliate: Driver-Initiated Takeover Under Aggression in Mixed Traffic

Yiqi Zhang, Haitao Chen
article en

Abstract

When exposed to aggression from surrounding human-driven vehicles (HDVs), automated vehicles (AVs) with conditional automation adopt defensive responses. However, human drivers may expect to respond with emotion-driven, retaliatory behaviors. This discrepancy between human drivers’ expectations and AV behavior may lead to driver-initiated takeovers, introducing abrupt control transitions and retaliatory driving that threaten traffic safety. In a driving simulator study with 42 licensed drivers, participants experienced different aggressive events (honking, tailgating, and sharp braking) under low and high aggression levels. The results indicated that drivers perceived higher levels of aggression and were more likely to initiate takeovers during sharp braking compared to honking and tailgating, as well as under higher aggression levels. The differences in perceived aggression across event types diminished as the aggression level increased. These findings provide insights into when and why drivers override defensive automation and offer implications for the design of AV behavior in mixed-traffic environments.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Pennsylvania State University (US), Zhejiang University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.