Mechanical and microstructural characterization of dissimilar welded joints between S355J2 + N and S690QL steels using G69 and T46 filler wires

This study evaluates and compares the mechanical performance and microstructures of dissimilar welded joints made from S355J2 + N and S690QL steels, using G69 and T46 fillers. Tensile, Charpy V-notch (CVN) impact, and hardness tests were conducted, along with optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for microstructural and fractographic analysis. Average ultimate tensile strengths reached 540 ± 2.5 MPa for T46 and 524 ± 2.5 MPa for G69 joints, with all specimens fracturing within the weaker base metal (S355J2 + N) that had an ultimate tensile strength of 479 MPa, indicating successful overmatching with joint integrity. Hardness examination showed a peak value of 282 ± 3 HV in the S690QL-HAZ, attributed to the formation of martensite laths and localized tempered martensite. The G69 filler wire exhibited higher energy absorption ( 94 ± 13 J at − 20 ∘ C ) compared to the T46 wire ( 67 ± 23 J ). The T46 weld zone showed a higher density of brittle cleavage facets, likely due to the presence of M-A constituents. Despite the variances, all tested specimens fulfilled the minimum impact toughness requirement of 27 J at − 20 ∘ C according to EN 10025-2 standard for S355J2 + N structural steel, demonstrating that both filler wires are appropriate for high-strength dissimilar steel applications under the investigated conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Technology of Welding & Joining
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13621718261490820
Primary Topic
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Mechanical and microstructural characterization of dissimilar welded joints between S355J2 + N and S690QL steels using G69 and T46 filler wires

Fatih Güven, Ali Akay
Science and Technology of Welding & Joining
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
article

Mechanical and microstructural characterization of dissimilar welded joints between S355J2 + N and S690QL steels using G69 and T46 filler wires

Fatih Güven, Ali Akay
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates and compares the mechanical performance and microstructures of dissimilar welded joints made from S355J2 + N and S690QL steels, using G69 and T46 fillers. Tensile, Charpy V-notch (CVN) impact, and hardness tests were conducted, along with optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for microstructural and fractographic analysis. Average ultimate tensile strengths reached 540 ± 2.5 MPa for T46 and 524 ± 2.5 MPa for G69 joints, with all specimens fracturing within the weaker base metal (S355J2 + N) that had an ultimate tensile strength of 479 MPa, indicating successful overmatching with joint integrity. Hardness examination showed a peak value of 282 ± 3 HV in the S690QL-HAZ, attributed to the formation of martensite laths and localized tempered martensite. The G69 filler wire exhibited higher energy absorption ( 94 ± 13 J at − 20 ∘ C ) compared to the T46 wire ( 67 ± 23 J ). The T46 weld zone showed a higher density of brittle cleavage facets, likely due to the presence of M-A constituents. Despite the variances, all tested specimens fulfilled the minimum impact toughness requirement of 27 J at − 20 ∘ C according to EN 10025-2 standard for S355J2 + N structural steel, demonstrating that both filler wires are appropriate for high-strength dissimilar steel applications under the investigated conditions.

Science and Technology of Welding & Joining
Yıldız Technical University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.