Lymphovascular invasion and nodal positivity may identify candidates for adjuvant nivolumab in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To identify patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) who derive greater benefit from adjuvant nivolumab after radical surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 246 patients with high-risk MIUC who underwent radical surgery between 2018 and 2025. High-risk disease was defined according to the CheckMate 274 trial criteria. The real-world oncological outcomes of patients who received adjuvant nivolumab (n = 51) were compared with those of a contemporary control cohort (n = 51) and a historical control cohort (n = 144). Prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) in nivolumab-naïve patients were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression analysis. DFS for the entire cohort was stratified according to significant prognostic factors and nivolumab use. RESULTS: The adjuvant nivolumab cohort showed favorable oncological outcomes compared to both the contemporary and historical control cohorts. Multivariate analysis identified lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and nodal positivity as independent prognostic factors in nivolumab-naïve patients. In patients with LVI or nodal positivity, those who received adjuvant nivolumab had a significantly improved DFS compared with those who did not (hazard ratio 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.73; log-rank P = 0.002). However, in patients with neither LVI nor nodal positivity, DFS did not differ significantly according to adjuvant nivolumab use (P = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that LVI and nodal positivity may help identify patients with high-risk MIUC who are more likely to benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. These pathological features may serve as practical markers for patient selection; however, further validation is required before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.08.012
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Lymphovascular invasion and nodal positivity may identify candidates for adjuvant nivolumab in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma

Tetsuya Urasaki, Masaharu Inoue, Yuji Miura, Ryosuke Oki et al.
Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Lymphovascular invasion and nodal positivity may identify candidates for adjuvant nivolumab in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma

Tetsuya Urasaki, Masaharu Inoue, Yuji Miura, Ryosuke Oki, Ryo Fujiwara, Kosuke null Takemura, Noboru Numao, Hiroki Shimoda, Takashi Tamiya, Junji Yonese
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) who derive greater benefit from adjuvant nivolumab after radical surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 246 patients with high-risk MIUC who underwent radical surgery between 2018 and 2025. High-risk disease was defined according to the CheckMate 274 trial criteria. The real-world oncological outcomes of patients who received adjuvant nivolumab (n = 51) were compared with those of a contemporary control cohort (n = 51) and a historical control cohort (n = 144). Prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) in nivolumab-naïve patients were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression analysis. DFS for the entire cohort was stratified according to significant prognostic factors and nivolumab use. RESULTS: The adjuvant nivolumab cohort showed favorable oncological outcomes compared to both the contemporary and historical control cohorts. Multivariate analysis identified lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and nodal positivity as independent prognostic factors in nivolumab-naïve patients. In patients with LVI or nodal positivity, those who received adjuvant nivolumab had a significantly improved DFS compared with those who did not (hazard ratio 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.73; log-rank P = 0.002). However, in patients with neither LVI nor nodal positivity, DFS did not differ significantly according to adjuvant nivolumab use (P = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that LVI and nodal positivity may help identify patients with high-risk MIUC who are more likely to benefit from adjuvant nivolumab. These pathological features may serve as practical markers for patient selection; however, further validation is required before clinical implementation.

Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original InvestigationsVol. 44(11)
The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP), Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.