Duration Between Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy Does Not Affect Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Purpose To evaluate whether the duration between staged bilateral hip arthroscopy affects patient‐reported outcomes, the rate of arthroscopic revision, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Methods A retrospective comparative case series was conducted of a single‐surgeon prospective database of patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with a minimum of 2‐year follow‐up. Modified Harris Hip Score and Nonarthritic Hip Score were recorded preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively for each hip. For analysis, patients were allocated into 2 groups: staged procedures <1 year apart and ≥1 year apart. Results A total of 76 patients (152 hips) underwent staged bilateral primary hip arthroscopies. Overall, the mean age at the first surgery was 36.1 ± 13.1 years and the cohort was 59.2% women. Of these, 43 patients (56.6%) underwent staged procedures <1 year apart, whereas 33 patients (43.4%) were staged 1 year apart. Age ( P = .092), sex ( P = .828), and body mass index ( P = .867) did not significantly differ between groups. At 2‐year follow‐up, modified Harris Hip Score (first hip: 85.2 ± 17.9 vs 82.5 ± 13.3, P = .588; second hip: 84.7 ± 19.3 vs 79.3 ± 16.0, P = .514) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (first hip: 85.3 ± 19.1 vs 83.2 ± 12.4, P = .660; second hip: 86.5 ± 22.8 vs 84.9 ± 12.2, P = .823) were similar between groups staged <1 year and ≥1 year. There were no significant differences in rates of revision arthroscopy (7.0% vs 12.1%, P = .460) or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (4.7% vs 3.0%, P > .999) between groups staged <1 year and ≥1 year. Based on logistic regression, the duration between hip arthroscopy stages was not associated with the risk of arthroscopic failure (odds ratio: 1.29, P = .227). Conclusions There were no significant differences in patient‐reported outcomes, rates of revision arthroscopy, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty between patients who underwent staged bilateral hip arthroscopy less than or greater than 1 year apart. Duration of time between staged procedures was not found to affect rates of arthroscopic failure. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arj.70621
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Duration Between Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy Does Not Affect Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Matthew T. Kingery, Michelle S. Shen, Zachary I. Li, Thomas J. Youm et al.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Hip disorders and treatments
article

Duration Between Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy Does Not Affect Outcomes in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Matthew T. Kingery, Michelle S. Shen, Zachary I. Li, Thomas J. Youm, James C. Messina, MICHAEL R. MOORE, Sharif Garra
article en

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate whether the duration between staged bilateral hip arthroscopy affects patient‐reported outcomes, the rate of arthroscopic revision, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Methods A retrospective comparative case series was conducted of a single‐surgeon prospective database of patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with a minimum of 2‐year follow‐up. Modified Harris Hip Score and Nonarthritic Hip Score were recorded preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively for each hip. For analysis, patients were allocated into 2 groups: staged procedures <1 year apart and ≥1 year apart. Results A total of 76 patients (152 hips) underwent staged bilateral primary hip arthroscopies. Overall, the mean age at the first surgery was 36.1 ± 13.1 years and the cohort was 59.2% women. Of these, 43 patients (56.6%) underwent staged procedures <1 year apart, whereas 33 patients (43.4%) were staged 1 year apart. Age ( P = .092), sex ( P = .828), and body mass index ( P = .867) did not significantly differ between groups. At 2‐year follow‐up, modified Harris Hip Score (first hip: 85.2 ± 17.9 vs 82.5 ± 13.3, P = .588; second hip: 84.7 ± 19.3 vs 79.3 ± 16.0, P = .514) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (first hip: 85.3 ± 19.1 vs 83.2 ± 12.4, P = .660; second hip: 86.5 ± 22.8 vs 84.9 ± 12.2, P = .823) were similar between groups staged <1 year and ≥1 year. There were no significant differences in rates of revision arthroscopy (7.0% vs 12.1%, P = .460) or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (4.7% vs 3.0%, P > .999) between groups staged <1 year and ≥1 year. Based on logistic regression, the duration between hip arthroscopy stages was not associated with the risk of arthroscopic failure (odds ratio: 1.29, P = .227). Conclusions There were no significant differences in patient‐reported outcomes, rates of revision arthroscopy, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty between patients who underwent staged bilateral hip arthroscopy less than or greater than 1 year apart. Duration of time between staged procedures was not found to affect rates of arthroscopic failure. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
NYU Langone Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.