Psychosocial and clinical factors associated with diabetes self-management in type 2 diabetes

This study aimed to explore the psychosocial and clinical predictors of self-management among adults with type 2 diabetes. Using a cross-sectional design, 60 participants completed an online survey including sociodemographic data, the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Self-Stigma Scale (SSS), and Diabetes Symptom Checklist–Revised (DSC-R). Sleep duration and diabetes duration were also recorded. The average age was 59.53 ± 12.96 years; 51.7% were female and 65% were married. Correlation analysis showed that self-management was negatively associated with anxiety and self-stigma. Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant model (p = 0.025), explaining 23.1% of the variance in self-management. Anxiety was a significant negative predictor (β = −0.34, p = 0.012), while, unexpectedly, depression positively predicted better self-management (β=+0.35, p = 0.014). Self-stigma was not a statistically significant independent predictor (β = −0.20, p = 0.097). Symptom burden, sleep duration, and diabetes duration were not also significant predictors. These findings highlight the important role of psychological factors in diabetes self-care, particularly the negative association between anxiety and self-management. The unexpected positive association observed for depression should be interpreted cautiously. Further research is needed to clarify the role of self-stigma and the complex relationships between psychological factors and diabetes self-management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Health & Medicine
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2026.2737836
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Psychosocial and clinical factors associated with diabetes self-management in type 2 diabetes

Gökçen Akyürek, Gülşah Zengin Yazıcı, Gül Elvan Uysal
Psychology Health & Medicine
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Psychosocial and clinical factors associated with diabetes self-management in type 2 diabetes

Gökçen Akyürek, Gülşah Zengin Yazıcı, Gül Elvan Uysal
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the psychosocial and clinical predictors of self-management among adults with type 2 diabetes. Using a cross-sectional design, 60 participants completed an online survey including sociodemographic data, the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Self-Stigma Scale (SSS), and Diabetes Symptom Checklist–Revised (DSC-R). Sleep duration and diabetes duration were also recorded. The average age was 59.53 ± 12.96 years; 51.7% were female and 65% were married. Correlation analysis showed that self-management was negatively associated with anxiety and self-stigma. Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant model (p = 0.025), explaining 23.1% of the variance in self-management. Anxiety was a significant negative predictor (β = −0.34, p = 0.012), while, unexpectedly, depression positively predicted better self-management (β=+0.35, p = 0.014). Self-stigma was not a statistically significant independent predictor (β = −0.20, p = 0.097). Symptom burden, sleep duration, and diabetes duration were not also significant predictors. These findings highlight the important role of psychological factors in diabetes self-care, particularly the negative association between anxiety and self-management. The unexpected positive association observed for depression should be interpreted cautiously. Further research is needed to clarify the role of self-stigma and the complex relationships between psychological factors and diabetes self-management.

Psychology Health & Medicine
Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.