Mandala logic: mytho‐praxis as vernacular political theory in Myanmar

This article argues that myth‐making is a form of vernacular social theory, a way of producing conceptual arguments about how social formations work and what is at stake in them. I focus on a myth from Myanmar, the Myth of the Tea Seeds, and its attendant ritual complex, which culminates in an annual religious festival in the highland town of Namhsan. Drawing on the so‐called ‘mandala model’, a classic historiographic approach for the study of Southeast Asia, I show how Ta'ang and Burmese people navigate sedimented trans‐regional power relations, and how highlanders and lowlanders alike engage in acts of retelling, exegesis, and critique that test the limits of the myth as a theoretical tool. What emerges is a picture of core‐periphery politics that looks less like a dialectic of coercion and evasion, and more like a system of antagonistic mutual dependence. Here, mythology is contested ground, a site for interrogating the relationship between abstract social theorization and lived social relations amidst long local histories of accommodation and struggle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.70205
Primary Topic
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Mandala logic: mytho‐praxis as vernacular political theory in Myanmar

Michael R. Dunford
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
article

Mandala logic: mytho‐praxis as vernacular political theory in Myanmar

Michael R. Dunford
article en

Abstract

This article argues that myth‐making is a form of vernacular social theory, a way of producing conceptual arguments about how social formations work and what is at stake in them. I focus on a myth from Myanmar, the Myth of the Tea Seeds, and its attendant ritual complex, which culminates in an annual religious festival in the highland town of Namhsan. Drawing on the so‐called ‘mandala model’, a classic historiographic approach for the study of Southeast Asia, I show how Ta'ang and Burmese people navigate sedimented trans‐regional power relations, and how highlanders and lowlanders alike engage in acts of retelling, exegesis, and critique that test the limits of the myth as a theoretical tool. What emerges is a picture of core‐periphery politics that looks less like a dialectic of coercion and evasion, and more like a system of antagonistic mutual dependence. Here, mythology is contested ground, a site for interrogating the relationship between abstract social theorization and lived social relations amidst long local histories of accommodation and struggle.

Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
National University of Singapore (SG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.