Digital divide, social development, and gender disparity: a critical analysis of the National Education Policy 2020: ways forward

Standing at the crux of a situation when digitization, corporate monopoly, media oligopoly, etc. have become the new “normal” of a capitalized worldview, the education system in India has also undergone a sea change. The commodification of education has made the divide, or the gap between the rural and urban populations, the rich and the poor, the backward and the upfront or mainstream learners, gender disparity and gender mainstreaming more apparent. In the name of academic excellence and academic collaboration, a host of pressing market imperatives or competitive edge factors are imposed on educational institutions, which is symptomatic of a neo liberalization process where education is no longer an ideology but rather a commodity. And to hide this economic and political rationality behind liberalizing education under the garb of “development,” a series of changes in terms of structuring and restructuring variables to decide the performance of academia in the national and international market have been put in place. The intensification of academic work, reinventing teaching-learning methodologies, research, and academic service, and the increase in various measurements of productivity, efficiency, quality, and accountability have placed new demands on academics to perform productively and reinvent themselves. This study has identified the consequences of these material and affective changes in the Indian higher education system—as is evident in the New Education Policy 2020—and how conducive it is for bringing in social and economic development for all, especially for the Indian rural population. Also, the study will look into the “development” paradigm from the prism of gender equity and sustainable inclusive growth, where education plays a key role in bringing in equitable distribution of wealth and resources. The research method used in this study is historical analysis, semiotic analysis and discourse analysis. The findings of the study clearly indicate that the primary and secondary education system in rural India, especially Govt. or Govt.-aided school have to be upgraded enough to accommodate digitization in the teaching-learning method. Indian Govt. must allocate more funds for making education accessible and affordable to the rural population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-09166-9
Primary Topic
Gender and Technology in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Digital divide, social development, and gender disparity: a critical analysis of the National Education Policy 2020: ways forward

Shyamali Banerjee, Suhas Kashyap
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Gender and Technology in Education
article

Digital divide, social development, and gender disparity: a critical analysis of the National Education Policy 2020: ways forward

Shyamali Banerjee, Suhas Kashyap
article en

Abstract

Standing at the crux of a situation when digitization, corporate monopoly, media oligopoly, etc. have become the new “normal” of a capitalized worldview, the education system in India has also undergone a sea change. The commodification of education has made the divide, or the gap between the rural and urban populations, the rich and the poor, the backward and the upfront or mainstream learners, gender disparity and gender mainstreaming more apparent. In the name of academic excellence and academic collaboration, a host of pressing market imperatives or competitive edge factors are imposed on educational institutions, which is symptomatic of a neo liberalization process where education is no longer an ideology but rather a commodity. And to hide this economic and political rationality behind liberalizing education under the garb of “development,” a series of changes in terms of structuring and restructuring variables to decide the performance of academia in the national and international market have been put in place. The intensification of academic work, reinventing teaching-learning methodologies, research, and academic service, and the increase in various measurements of productivity, efficiency, quality, and accountability have placed new demands on academics to perform productively and reinvent themselves. This study has identified the consequences of these material and affective changes in the Indian higher education system—as is evident in the New Education Policy 2020—and how conducive it is for bringing in social and economic development for all, especially for the Indian rural population. Also, the study will look into the “development” paradigm from the prism of gender equity and sustainable inclusive growth, where education plays a key role in bringing in equitable distribution of wealth and resources. The research method used in this study is historical analysis, semiotic analysis and discourse analysis. The findings of the study clearly indicate that the primary and secondary education system in rural India, especially Govt. or Govt.-aided school have to be upgraded enough to accommodate digitization in the teaching-learning method. Indian Govt. must allocate more funds for making education accessible and affordable to the rural population.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Jain University (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender and Technology in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.