Reliability, Validity and Determinants of Self‐Reported Autonomic Dysfunction in Prodromal and Established Parkinson's Disease

Abstract Background Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease Autonomic Dysfunction Scale (SCOPA‐AUT) is a widely used, self‐reported scale to evaluate autonomic dysfunction in PD. Recent literature on interoception has raised questions about validity. Several knowledge gaps remain minimal detectable change (MDC), best subscale structure, validation against objective autonomic measures, and performance in prodromal populations. Objective To critically expand knowledge of SCOPA‐AUT's measurement properties with novel analyses to increase confidence as an outcome measure. Methods Data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) were analyzed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses determined subscale structure. Test–retest reliability helped derive the MDC. Criterion and construct validity were assessed using objective measures (e.g., orthostatic hypotension (OH)) with area‐under‐the‐curves and correlations. Mixed models identified the best predictors of self‐reported autonomic dysfunction. Results Data on 4450 individuals, including healthy controls ( n = 343), prodromal ( n = 2539) and established PD ( n = 1503) participants, were analyzed. The total scale had strong reliability ( ω = 0.86; ICC = 0.78), with an MDC≥6. The published six‐subscale structure showed adequate fit, but splitting the gastrointestinal domain into upper (oral) and lower (intestinal) factors significantly improved model fit. Criterion validity against objective OH was poor (AUC = 0.59). SCOPA‐AUT correlated most strongly with non‐motor experiences of daily living ( r s = 0.62, large effect), which was also its strongest longitudinal predictor, followed by motor experiences of daily living. Conclusions SCOPA‐AUT is a reliable, valid scale in prodromal and established PD. The published subscale, while adequate, may benefit from modification. SCOPA‐AUT correlates robustly with non‐motor, followed by motor experiences of daily living, supporting its continued use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70826
Primary Topic
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Reliability, Validity and Determinants of Self‐Reported Autonomic Dysfunction in Prodromal and Established Parkinson's Disease

David Andrés González, Abhimanyu Mahajan, Aimee James Karstens
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Reliability, Validity and Determinants of Self‐Reported Autonomic Dysfunction in Prodromal and Established Parkinson's Disease

David Andrés González, Abhimanyu Mahajan, Aimee James Karstens
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease Autonomic Dysfunction Scale (SCOPA‐AUT) is a widely used, self‐reported scale to evaluate autonomic dysfunction in PD. Recent literature on interoception has raised questions about validity. Several knowledge gaps remain minimal detectable change (MDC), best subscale structure, validation against objective autonomic measures, and performance in prodromal populations. Objective To critically expand knowledge of SCOPA‐AUT's measurement properties with novel analyses to increase confidence as an outcome measure. Methods Data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) were analyzed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses determined subscale structure. Test–retest reliability helped derive the MDC. Criterion and construct validity were assessed using objective measures (e.g., orthostatic hypotension (OH)) with area‐under‐the‐curves and correlations. Mixed models identified the best predictors of self‐reported autonomic dysfunction. Results Data on 4450 individuals, including healthy controls ( n = 343), prodromal ( n = 2539) and established PD ( n = 1503) participants, were analyzed. The total scale had strong reliability ( ω = 0.86; ICC = 0.78), with an MDC≥6. The published six‐subscale structure showed adequate fit, but splitting the gastrointestinal domain into upper (oral) and lower (intestinal) factors significantly improved model fit. Criterion validity against objective OH was poor (AUC = 0.59). SCOPA‐AUT correlated most strongly with non‐motor experiences of daily living ( r s = 0.62, large effect), which was also its strongest longitudinal predictor, followed by motor experiences of daily living. Conclusions SCOPA‐AUT is a reliable, valid scale in prodromal and established PD. The published subscale, while adequate, may benefit from modification. SCOPA‐AUT correlates robustly with non‐motor, followed by motor experiences of daily living, supporting its continued use.

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Rush University Medical Center (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.