Introduction to Network Meta-Analysis
Many treatment decisions in hospital medicine are not divalent choices between 2 options but, rather, decisions among multiple possible interventions. While traditional pairwise meta-analysis can provide information on the effectiveness of 1 or 2 interventions, a different strategy is required to evaluate the relative merits of multiple possible interventions. Network meta-analysis is a robust statistical tool to analyze 3 or more interventions for a single problem, allowing for comparisons of interventions that may not have been directly compared in head-to-head studies. This guide provides an introductory overview of network meta-analysis, focusing on how this analysis differs from traditional pairwise meta-analysis. We focus on key assumptions in network meta-analysis, including transitivity and consistency as well as considerations of evidence strength and bias. This guide can serve as a starting point for a researcher seeking to perform their own network meta-analysis or a guide for a clinician looking to interpret published studies.
Authors
- Alastair Fung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5615-4947)
- David D’Arienzo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9601-8533)
- Nassr Nama (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-3599)
- Elise P. Lu
Institutions
- Western University (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Montreal Children's Hospital (CA)
- London Health Sciences Centre (CA)
- Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
- Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
- Children's Hospital of Western Ontario (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Hospital Pediatrics
- Published
- 2026-09-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2025-009002
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00