Biliopancreatic limb length in one-anastomosis gastric bypass: weight-loss outcomes in a BMI-tailored observational cohort

Abstract Background The optimal biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length in one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) remains controversial. Because BPL length is frequently tailored to baseline patient characteristics, observational comparisons may be confounded by patient selection. We evaluated whether BPL length independently influenced long-term outcomes after adjustment for baseline obesity severity. Methods This retrospective single-center cohort included 147 consecutive patients undergoing primary OAGB between 2019 and 2022. According to an institutional BMI-tailored strategy, patients received a 150-cm (n = 46), 180-cm (n = 52) or 200-cm (n = 49) BPL. The primary endpoint was percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 36 months. Multivariable analyses adjusted for baseline BMI. Results Baseline BMI differed significantly among groups. Although crude analyses showed significant differences in 36-month %TWL, BPL length was no longer independently associated with weight loss after BMI adjustment, whereas baseline BMI remained an independent predictor. Anemia rates were similar across groups, while hypoalbuminemia occurred numerically more frequently after a 200-cm BPL. Smoking independently predicted marginal ulcer. Conclusions Within a BMI-tailored OAGB strategy, extending the BPL beyond 180 cm did not improve long-term weight loss after adjustment for baseline BMI. These findings suggest that observational comparisons of BPL length should account for patient allocation and support individualized BPL selection until high-quality prospective evidence becomes available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04368-w
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Biliopancreatic limb length in one-anastomosis gastric bypass: weight-loss outcomes in a BMI-tailored observational cohort

Giuseppe Cavallaro, Angelo Iossa, Alessandra Micalizzi, Sara Giovampietro et al.
4 links
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Biliopancreatic limb length in one-anastomosis gastric bypass: weight-loss outcomes in a BMI-tailored observational cohort

Giuseppe Cavallaro, Angelo Iossa, Alessandra Micalizzi, Sara Giovampietro, Diletta Di Meo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The optimal biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length in one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) remains controversial. Because BPL length is frequently tailored to baseline patient characteristics, observational comparisons may be confounded by patient selection. We evaluated whether BPL length independently influenced long-term outcomes after adjustment for baseline obesity severity. Methods This retrospective single-center cohort included 147 consecutive patients undergoing primary OAGB between 2019 and 2022. According to an institutional BMI-tailored strategy, patients received a 150-cm (n = 46), 180-cm (n = 52) or 200-cm (n = 49) BPL. The primary endpoint was percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 36 months. Multivariable analyses adjusted for baseline BMI. Results Baseline BMI differed significantly among groups. Although crude analyses showed significant differences in 36-month %TWL, BPL length was no longer independently associated with weight loss after BMI adjustment, whereas baseline BMI remained an independent predictor. Anemia rates were similar across groups, while hypoalbuminemia occurred numerically more frequently after a 200-cm BPL. Smoking independently predicted marginal ulcer. Conclusions Within a BMI-tailored OAGB strategy, extending the BPL beyond 180 cm did not improve long-term weight loss after adjustment for baseline BMI. These findings suggest that observational comparisons of BPL length should account for patient allocation and support individualized BPL selection until high-quality prospective evidence becomes available.

Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Good health and well-being
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon