Housing type mix as a lever for sustainable urban mobility

Land use-transport interactions are well documented in literature using urban form metrics including density, land–use mix, and destination accessibility, but rarely housing type shares. This study demonstrates the overlooked explanatory and causal relevance of housing typology, specifically the single–family housing share, for four mobility outcomes: car travel, transit travel, car ownership, and CO 2 emissions. Using postcode–level data for 13 cities in Germany and France, we compare the role of urban form metrics across linear regression, gradient–boosted decision trees, artificial neural networks, causal discovery, and double machine learning methods. Single–family share consistently outperforms conventional urban form indicators in explaining each outcome. Given its strong predictive power, causal relevance, and ease of measurement, housing typology offers substantial potential for modelling land use-transport interactions and provides a promising cross–sectoral focus for climate and mobility policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2026.105646
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Housing type mix as a lever for sustainable urban mobility

Peter Berrill
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Housing type mix as a lever for sustainable urban mobility

Peter Berrill
article en

Abstract

Land use-transport interactions are well documented in literature using urban form metrics including density, land–use mix, and destination accessibility, but rarely housing type shares. This study demonstrates the overlooked explanatory and causal relevance of housing typology, specifically the single–family housing share, for four mobility outcomes: car travel, transit travel, car ownership, and CO 2 emissions. Using postcode–level data for 13 cities in Germany and France, we compare the role of urban form metrics across linear regression, gradient–boosted decision trees, artificial neural networks, causal discovery, and double machine learning methods. Single–family share consistently outperforms conventional urban form indicators in explaining each outcome. Given its strong predictive power, causal relevance, and ease of measurement, housing typology offers substantial potential for modelling land use-transport interactions and provides a promising cross–sectoral focus for climate and mobility policy.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 161
Leiden University (NL), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Housing type mix as a lever for sustainable urban mobility — Peter Berrill · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS