Recasting Islamic Thought in China: Conceptual Reconfiguration and Interreligious Dialogue in the Han Kitab Tradition

This article examines how Chinese Muslim scholars in the Han Kitab tradition reinterpreted Chinese concepts to articulate Islamic thought within the Chinese intellectual world. Drawing on close readings of the writings of Wang Daiyu (c.1584–1660 CE), Liu Zhi (c.1670–1724 CE), Ma Zhu (c.1640–1711 CE), and Ma Dexin (c.1794–1874 CE), it analyzes three sets of concepts: Tian; Taiji and Wuji; and sagehood, the Great Mandate, Xin, and Xing. The analysis shows that Han Kitab scholars did not simply translate Islamic ideas into Chinese terms. Rather, they modified the meanings of established Chinese concepts, repositioned them in relation to other concepts, and assigned them new explanatory roles within an Islamic theological framework. These reinterpretations allowed concepts relating to divine transcendence, cosmological order, human perfection, and moral cultivation to take on new functions within Islamic thought. This article argues that such conceptual reconfiguration offers a useful way of understanding Sino-Islamic intellectual engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17101118
Primary Topic
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Recasting Islamic Thought in China: Conceptual Reconfiguration and Interreligious Dialogue in the Han Kitab Tradition

Fiona Fu
Religions
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
article

Recasting Islamic Thought in China: Conceptual Reconfiguration and Interreligious Dialogue in the Han Kitab Tradition

Fiona Fu
article en

Abstract

This article examines how Chinese Muslim scholars in the Han Kitab tradition reinterpreted Chinese concepts to articulate Islamic thought within the Chinese intellectual world. Drawing on close readings of the writings of Wang Daiyu (c.1584–1660 CE), Liu Zhi (c.1670–1724 CE), Ma Zhu (c.1640–1711 CE), and Ma Dexin (c.1794–1874 CE), it analyzes three sets of concepts: Tian; Taiji and Wuji; and sagehood, the Great Mandate, Xin, and Xing. The analysis shows that Han Kitab scholars did not simply translate Islamic ideas into Chinese terms. Rather, they modified the meanings of established Chinese concepts, repositioned them in relation to other concepts, and assigned them new explanatory roles within an Islamic theological framework. These reinterpretations allowed concepts relating to divine transcendence, cosmological order, human perfection, and moral cultivation to take on new functions within Islamic thought. This article argues that such conceptual reconfiguration offers a useful way of understanding Sino-Islamic intellectual engagement.

ReligionsVol. 17(10)
Taizhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.