Diaphragmatic Reconstruction with StratticeTM Biologic Mesh After Thoracic Oncologic Resection: A 10-Year Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

(1) Background: Large diaphragmatic defects following thoracic oncologic resection often require mesh reconstruction. Data regarding biologic mesh for this application remain limited. We evaluated clinical outcomes and durability of Strattice™, a non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix, for diaphragmatic reconstruction. (2) Methods: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study without a synthetic mesh comparator, we reviewed health records of 65 adults who underwent diaphragmatic reconstruction with Strattice™ mesh at a high-volume thoracic surgery center between 2014 and 2024. (3) Results: Mean hospital length of stay was 13.2 days. Atrial fibrillation was the most common post-operative complication, occurring in 44.6% of the patients. No diaphragmatic reconstruction recurrence or mesh replacement was observed during the available follow-up. (4) Conclusions: No reconstruction recurrence or mesh replacement was identified during the available follow-up, and wound infection was rare, supporting the feasibility of Strattice™ mesh for diaphragmatic reconstruction in this single-center cohort study. Strattice™ provided durable diaphragmatic reconstruction with a low observed wound infection rate and no identified reconstruction failure, supporting its feasibility for complex thoracic oncologic reconstruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life16101597
Primary Topic
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Diaphragmatic Reconstruction with StratticeTM Biologic Mesh After Thoracic Oncologic Resection: A 10-Year Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Jeffrey B. Velotta, Elaine Liang, Ivana Vasic, Alexis S. King et al.
Life
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
article

Diaphragmatic Reconstruction with StratticeTM Biologic Mesh After Thoracic Oncologic Resection: A 10-Year Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Jeffrey B. Velotta, Elaine Liang, Ivana Vasic, Alexis S. King, Pranita Mishra, Yolana L.E. Moonsamy, Michael T. Ou
article en

Abstract

(1) Background: Large diaphragmatic defects following thoracic oncologic resection often require mesh reconstruction. Data regarding biologic mesh for this application remain limited. We evaluated clinical outcomes and durability of Strattice™, a non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix, for diaphragmatic reconstruction. (2) Methods: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study without a synthetic mesh comparator, we reviewed health records of 65 adults who underwent diaphragmatic reconstruction with Strattice™ mesh at a high-volume thoracic surgery center between 2014 and 2024. (3) Results: Mean hospital length of stay was 13.2 days. Atrial fibrillation was the most common post-operative complication, occurring in 44.6% of the patients. No diaphragmatic reconstruction recurrence or mesh replacement was observed during the available follow-up. (4) Conclusions: No reconstruction recurrence or mesh replacement was identified during the available follow-up, and wound infection was rare, supporting the feasibility of Strattice™ mesh for diaphragmatic reconstruction in this single-center cohort study. Strattice™ provided durable diaphragmatic reconstruction with a low observed wound infection rate and no identified reconstruction failure, supporting its feasibility for complex thoracic oncologic reconstruction.

LifeVol. 16(10)
Kaiser Permanente (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), California State University, East Bay (US), Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center (US), University of San Francisco (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.