Computable Design Intent: A Versioned Graph for Engineering Consistency and Evidence Traceability

Engineering decisions acquire meaning through relationships between requirements, rationale, configurations, authority, and evidence. These connections may be scattered across company records or remain implicit. Greater language-model capability can assist interpretation, but current organizational knowledge must still be supplied and maintained. Motivated by the author’s development of DVIT, this paper proposes evidence-backed ingestion into a persistent, domain-specific relationship map. Computable Design Intent (CDI) is the portion of intent represented with sufficient scope and semantics for a defined operation. The Computable Design Intent Graph (CDIG) connects these records with their sources, decisions, and history. The method makes initial capture and continuing maintenance central to downstream reuse. It can support retrieval, change review, constraint comparison, and evidence assessment, including through MCP. Semiconductor examples illustrate how scoped declarations and authored relationships yield review questions. The hypothesis to evaluate is whether reuse of this maintained context improves downstream work enough to justify its lifecycle cost.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22935902
Primary Topic
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Computable Design Intent: A Versioned Graph for Engineering Consistency and Evidence Traceability

Akshay Sehgal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
article

Computable Design Intent: A Versioned Graph for Engineering Consistency and Evidence Traceability

Akshay Sehgal
article en

Abstract

Engineering decisions acquire meaning through relationships between requirements, rationale, configurations, authority, and evidence. These connections may be scattered across company records or remain implicit. Greater language-model capability can assist interpretation, but current organizational knowledge must still be supplied and maintained. Motivated by the author’s development of DVIT, this paper proposes evidence-backed ingestion into a persistent, domain-specific relationship map. Computable Design Intent (CDI) is the portion of intent represented with sufficient scope and semantics for a defined operation. The Computable Design Intent Graph (CDIG) connects these records with their sources, decisions, and history. The method makes initial capture and continuing maintenance central to downstream reuse. It can support retrieval, change review, constraint comparison, and evidence assessment, including through MCP. Semiconductor examples illustrate how scoped declarations and authored relationships yield review questions. The hypothesis to evaluate is whether reuse of this maintained context improves downstream work enough to justify its lifecycle cost.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Computable Design Intent: A Versioned Graph for Engineering Consistency and Evidence Traceability — Akshay Sehgal · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS