Effects of Clenching Intensity and Duration on Pressure Pain Threshold and Masseter‐Muscle Stiffness Under Standardised EMG ‐Based Contraction Exposure

ABSTRACT Background Low‐intensity, long‐duration clenching is considered more harmful to the stomatognathic system than high‐intensity, short‐duration clenching; however, their physiological effects under standardised EMG‐based contraction exposure remain unclear. Objective To compare the effects of low‐intensity, long‐duration (LL) and high‐intensity, short‐duration (HS) clenching on pressure pain threshold (PPT) and masseter muscle stiffness under standardised EMG‐based contraction exposure. Methods Thirty‐six participants completed a randomised crossover study. They performed Task LL (10% maximum voluntary contraction [MVC] for 75 s) and Task HS (50% MVC for 15 s) on separate days, with a washout period of ≥ 7 days. Each task comprised 30 sets with 15‐s rests, and equivalent prescribed contraction exposure (intensity × duration × sets). PPT and muscle stiffness were assessed at baseline and 0, 10, 20 and 30 min post‐task. Data were analysed using mixed‐effects models with Bonferroni‐adjusted post hoc comparisons and baseline‐adjusted ANCOVA; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results All participants (mean age 29.0 ± 6.6 years; 50% female) completed the study. PPT immediately after LL was significantly lower than after HS (baseline‐adjusted mean difference, −11.5 kPa; p = 0.026). Muscle stiffness showed a significant time effect only after HS ( p < 0.001). Immediately after HS, muscle stiffness was lower than baseline (mean difference, −22.4 N/m; p < 0.001) and lower than after LL (baseline‐adjusted mean difference, −20.0 N/m; p < 0.001). Conclusion Under equivalent prescribed EMG‐based contraction exposure, PPT was lower after LL than after HS, whereas HS caused transient reductions in muscle stiffness, indicating pattern‐dependent responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70317
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effects of Clenching Intensity and Duration on Pressure Pain Threshold and Masseter‐Muscle Stiffness Under Standardised EMG ‐Based Contraction Exposure

Keisuke Miyazono, Hiroyuki Ishiyama, Kenji Fueki, Akira Nishiyama
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Effects of Clenching Intensity and Duration on Pressure Pain Threshold and Masseter‐Muscle Stiffness Under Standardised EMG ‐Based Contraction Exposure

Keisuke Miyazono, Hiroyuki Ishiyama, Kenji Fueki, Akira Nishiyama
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Low‐intensity, long‐duration clenching is considered more harmful to the stomatognathic system than high‐intensity, short‐duration clenching; however, their physiological effects under standardised EMG‐based contraction exposure remain unclear. Objective To compare the effects of low‐intensity, long‐duration (LL) and high‐intensity, short‐duration (HS) clenching on pressure pain threshold (PPT) and masseter muscle stiffness under standardised EMG‐based contraction exposure. Methods Thirty‐six participants completed a randomised crossover study. They performed Task LL (10% maximum voluntary contraction [MVC] for 75 s) and Task HS (50% MVC for 15 s) on separate days, with a washout period of ≥ 7 days. Each task comprised 30 sets with 15‐s rests, and equivalent prescribed contraction exposure (intensity × duration × sets). PPT and muscle stiffness were assessed at baseline and 0, 10, 20 and 30 min post‐task. Data were analysed using mixed‐effects models with Bonferroni‐adjusted post hoc comparisons and baseline‐adjusted ANCOVA; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results All participants (mean age 29.0 ± 6.6 years; 50% female) completed the study. PPT immediately after LL was significantly lower than after HS (baseline‐adjusted mean difference, −11.5 kPa; p = 0.026). Muscle stiffness showed a significant time effect only after HS ( p < 0.001). Immediately after HS, muscle stiffness was lower than baseline (mean difference, −22.4 N/m; p < 0.001) and lower than after LL (baseline‐adjusted mean difference, −20.0 N/m; p < 0.001). Conclusion Under equivalent prescribed EMG‐based contraction exposure, PPT was lower after LL than after HS, whereas HS caused transient reductions in muscle stiffness, indicating pattern‐dependent responses.

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP), Institute of Science Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.