A Social Digital Identity Model of Misogyny

ABSTRACT Misogyny appears to be increasing among some men and boys. In the present paper we conceptualize this pressing societal issue as a form of intergroup prejudice that is shaped by both emerging technologies and social identity processes. Specifically, we outline a social digital identity model of misogyny in which engagement with polarizing, gendered online technologies can lead men and boys to see both themselves and the world in terms of an intergroup conflict between genders, in turn leading to negative attitudes towards women and girls. We tested this theoretical model in two correlational studies of men ( N men = 1398, ages 18–88) and boys ( N boys = 661, ages 13–17). Supporting the model, we found that engagement with online technologies predicted higher misogyny, and this relationship was mediated via greater perceptions of intergroup gender conflict. However, contrary to predictions, masculine social identification did not mediate this relationship, indicating that it is the content rather than the degree of masculine social identity that is particularly problematic in the context of misogyny. Online activities that were specifically gendered (e.g., engagement with ‘manfluencers’) were the most strongly related to misogyny. Indeed, when controlling for more gendered online engagement, social media use was not related to misogyny in men and predicted lower misogyny in boys. Moreover, the relationship between technology engagement and higher misogyny was stronger for boys than men. Practical implications are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.70096
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Social Digital Identity Model of Misogyny

Tegan Cruwys, Katherine J. Reynolds, S. Alexander Haslam, Georgina C. Lee et al.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

A Social Digital Identity Model of Misogyny

Tegan Cruwys, Katherine J. Reynolds, S. Alexander Haslam, Georgina C. Lee, William Bingley, Sara Meger
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Misogyny appears to be increasing among some men and boys. In the present paper we conceptualize this pressing societal issue as a form of intergroup prejudice that is shaped by both emerging technologies and social identity processes. Specifically, we outline a social digital identity model of misogyny in which engagement with polarizing, gendered online technologies can lead men and boys to see both themselves and the world in terms of an intergroup conflict between genders, in turn leading to negative attitudes towards women and girls. We tested this theoretical model in two correlational studies of men ( N men = 1398, ages 18–88) and boys ( N boys = 661, ages 13–17). Supporting the model, we found that engagement with online technologies predicted higher misogyny, and this relationship was mediated via greater perceptions of intergroup gender conflict. However, contrary to predictions, masculine social identification did not mediate this relationship, indicating that it is the content rather than the degree of masculine social identity that is particularly problematic in the context of misogyny. Online activities that were specifically gendered (e.g., engagement with ‘manfluencers’) were the most strongly related to misogyny. Indeed, when controlling for more gendered online engagement, social media use was not related to misogyny in men and predicted lower misogyny in boys. Moreover, the relationship between technology engagement and higher misogyny was stronger for boys than men. Practical implications are discussed.

Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Australian National University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.